2019-2-4 Resource Access Meeting Notes

Date

04 Feb 2019

Time	Item	Who	Description	Goals
5min	Housekeeping	Andrea Loigman	Notetaker - Deb Lamb
45min	Item states	Emma Boettcher	Item state transitions (bulk and single)	Determine requirements for how states change: understand where Needed For and Process should be applied & how a Process ends.
10min	Call numbers	Andrea Loigman	Where will call numbers need to be shown and what will they need to look like in those locations.	Call number requirements

Functional Area

Product Owner

Planned Release (if known)

Decision Reached

Reasoning

Link to Supporting Materials

Comments

e.g. loans, fees/fines

Name

e.g. Q4 2018, Q1 2019

Clearly stated decision

e.g. mock-up, JIRA issue

Item states

Recommendation: separate mechanism for ending a process from Check In

Associate the end of a process with a service point

Disinclined to "touch items twice", but seems preferable over the following:
- Circ staff are responsible for ending processes through Check In; since checking items in can also trigger processes, this would make it unclear whether an item is supposed to be in a process or not
- The system considers items to be shelved or awaiting pickup once the process ends
Need to know where items are coming from if they are stuck in transit