Thank you to Olamide Kolawole and everyone else who participated in this RFC!
Notes/Actions/etc:
We didn't follow the process closely so it seems like there isn't consistency
The metadata at the top about PR/issues approval is confusing
Moving between stages is unclear
If community engagement is light is such a heavy process needed?
Heaviness discourages. Also what is being asked for is "sure"
Topics tackled from retro board:
Update docs to reflect action items that impact process
Hard to tell when it has been approved
Remove unneeded metadata from the top of the template and add a status field and an outcome field, bullets for each stages PR. Remove start date
Exit criteria are unclear
how to get into the first stage. RFC process just says create a PR. Created PR back into FOLIO. Instead closed and open for public review. RFC process description doesn't work with the branch mechanics. Try being more explicit about the mechanics
remove timeframes
preliminary review/timeframes haven't worked well, partly because we haven't really been following the process. don't really have enough data to know how long each step takes.