Requirement questions | Linking bib field to authority record | Create/Edit/Delete authority record interactions

A. No change. Nothing happens as far as linking.

B. I expect something else. 

Edit MARC authority (010 $a field) records via quickMARC

1. User accesses MARC authority record (personal name - 100 $a Twain, Mark, $d 1835-1910) 
2. This record is linked to 1000 bib records
3. User edits the record's 010 $a value 
4. User hits Save 
5. Display a message that informs user of the total number of linked bib records that will be updated
6. If user proceeds with update then bib records will be updated in a separate process. 
7. The Outcome options columns has several questions.  

Question 1. If we cannot guarantee real-time updates of linked bib records (due to number of records to update) what is the MOST tolerable amount of time to wait for linked bib updates to complete that do not impact your workflows.   

A. 30 minutes 

B. 60 minutes

C. 8 hours

D. 12 hours

E. 24 hours

F. I want to schedule when these updates happen

G. Do not allow a user to change 010 $a. Make it a read-only field (just like 001).

H. I expect something else

Question 2. How should FOLIO communicate the state of updating linking MARC bib records?

A. Dashboard/widget

B. In-app report 

C. Job logs list similar to data import (UX) - https://bugfest-mg.int.aws.folio.org/data-import (username: folio / password: folio) 

D. I expect something else

Question 1

RW-B

Question 2

RW- see comment

Question 1

Question 2

RW- I'm not sure which method I want, but I would want a push notification of some type because chances are that I forgot this running a couple of minutes after it started

Edit MARC authority (1XX field) records via quickMARC

1. User accesses MARC authority record (personal name - 100 $a Twain, Mark, $d 1835-1910) 
2. This record is linked to 1000 bib records
3. User edits the record's 1XX value from from Twain, Mark to Twain, Marc E. 
4. User hits Save 
5. Display a message that informs user of the total number of linked bib records that will be updated
6. If user proceeds with update then bib records will be updated in a separate process. 
7. The Outcome options columns has several questions.  

Question 1. If we cannot guarantee real-time updates of linked bib records (due to number of records to update) what is the MOST tolerable amount of time to wait for linked bib updates to complete that do not impact your workflows.   

A. 30 minutes 

B. 60 minutes

C. 8 hours

D. 12 hours

E. 24 hours

F. I want to schedule when these updates happen

G. I expect something else

Question 2. How should FOLIO communicate the state of updating linking MARC bib records?

A. Dashboard/widget

B. In-app report 

C. Job logs list similar to data import (UX) - https://bugfest-mg.int.aws.folio.org/data-import (username: folio / password: folio) 

D. I expect something else

Question 1

RW-B

Question 2

RW- see comment

Question 1

Question 2

RW- I'm not sure which method I want, but I would want a push notification of some type because chances are that I forgot this running a couple of minutes after it started

Edit MARC authority (NOT 010 $a or 1XX field) field via quickMARC 

1. User accesses MARC authority record (personal name - 100 $a Twain, Mark, $d 1835-1910) 
2. This record is linked to 1000 bib records
3. User edits the record's 4XX value  
4. User hits Save 

A. No impact to any bib records linked to the authority record 

B. I expect something else

Edit MARC authority (1XX field) records via data import 

1. User imports a MARC authority record (personal name - 100 $a Twain, Mark, $d 1835-1910) 
2. This record is linked to 1000 bib records
3. Import includes an update to the record's 100 $a value from Twain, Mark to Twain, Marc E. 

Question 1. If we cannot guarantee real-time updates of linked bib records (due to number of records to update) what is the MOST tolerable amount of time to wait for linked bib updates to complete that do not impact your workflows.   

A. 30 minutes 

B. 60 minutes

C. 8 hours

D. 12 hours

E. 24 hours

F. I want to schedule when these updates happen

G. I expect something else

Question 2. How should FOLIO communicate the state of updating linking MARC bib records?

A. Dashboard/widget

B. In-app report 

C. Job logs list similar to data import (UX) - https://bugfest-mg.int.aws.folio.org/data-import (username: folio / password: folio) 

D. Add an indication of the status of updating bib records on the Data import job list?

E. I expect something else

Question 1

RW- same answers and comments to both questions as questions 2 and 3

Question 2

Edit MARC authority (010 $a field) records via data import 

1. User imports a MARC authority record (personal name - 100 $a Twain, Mark, $d 1835-1910) 
2. This record is linked to 1000 bib records
3. Import includes an update to the record's 010 $a value  

A. No impact. Create a new MARC authority record.

B. Update 010 $a value and update all linked bib fields' $0 

C. I expect something else

Edit MARC authority (NOT 010 $a or 1XX field) records via data import 

1. User imports a MARC authority record (personal name - 100 $a Twain, Mark, $d 1835-1910) 
2. This record is linked to 1000 bib records
3. Import includes an update to record's 4XX value  

A. No impact to any bib records linked to the authority record 

B. I expect something else

Delete MARC authority record via quickMARC

1. User wants to delete MARC authority record (personal name - 100 $a Twain, Mark, $d 1835-1910) 
2. This record is linked to 1000 bib records 

A. Allow for deletion to proceed. Ask user to confirm that they want to delete the authority record. Ensure they understand impact of unlinking these records by providing # of records to be unlinked.  Linked bib fields are no longer linked. Retain [$a Twain, Mark, $d 1835-1910 $0 <<URI>>] only change is user can now edit these values because no longer controlled. 

B. Do not allow a user to delete authority record with linked bib records. 

C. I expect something else