Skip to end of banner
Go to start of banner

2020-06-03 Meeting notes

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 4 Current »

Date

Attendees

Discussion items

TimeItemWhoNotes
45 MinUpgrades with Reference Data

Hear presentation, review discussion and recommendations on this page:

Upgrades with Reference data

Discussion:

  • Drew potential comparisons to Linux -but that only goes so far 
  • Are there dependencies on "labels" as well as (or opposed to) UUIDs for some data (like a status or an identifier type) - we think both are likely
  • Need to preserve the idea that some values need to be immutable
  • Major point is that the difference between data that can be modified and that which should not is not clear.
  • Agreement that there is an architectural challenge
  • Definitely user facing challenge as well (it's easy to get conflicts with data that comes with the system).
  • Design problem in that data defined in one module is required for operation of another module.
  • At practical level, useful to have examples of successful upgrades vs. failed upgrades (ACTION)
    • Help us identify near-term practical actions as distinct from long-term strategy.
  • Need distinction between data in a data set that is provided by the system vs added to or modified by tenants
    • Have some examples of crude solutions this in some places, not consistent
    • Possible to store system data in separate place, present unified view, or resolve issues after upgrade process, before opening to users
    • Integrity issue when required value goes away.
    • What happens when you introduce a new required value?
  • Need further discussion. 
 15 MinHow to get new/different things added to CI/CD Pipeline  TC

Discuss timing and process of this request to have a "Go" language module added to the FOLIO CI/CD pipeline:  FOLIO-2627 - Getting issue details... STATUS

Discussion: 

1) What's the process: Can't decide today. Need to consider later. Mike G will reach out to others outside of the meeting.

  • Both for new modules as well as new technology (languages, frameworks, databases, etc.)

2) Should we ask people to accommodate in Goldenrod timeframe? Consensus is NO.


  • No labels