Test status: COMPLETED WITH ERRORS

Overview IN PROGRESS

• Regression testing of Fiscal Year Rollover (FYR) on Eureka based environment in quesnelia release. 
  • The testing triggered from UI for the ledger with generated amount of defined data set (Data quantity**: 50000 orders with Open status and 50000 orders with Pending status).
• Testing include two different phases of the fiscal year transition process:
  • #1 phase: Test Fiscal Year Rollover - is a risk free simulation pre-step to #2 phase which includes only Finance part of the data (to preview how the rollover settings will affect funds, budgets, and encumbrances).
  • #2 phase: Fiscal Year Rollover - perform a permanent changes. It is the actual process which move financial data, budgets, and encumbrances into the new fiscal year. It includes not only Finance but Orders parts of the data too.
• The purpose of testing is to define duration time of those 2 phases, to do comparison between current and previous results of each phase, to find any trends for resource utilization. To recommend improvements how to make it work better if any confirmed.
  • Previous successful testing for #2 phase took 29 hours

• Jiras/ links:

  • The previous results reports:
    • [Poppy] Fiscal year rollover testing
    • [Orchid] Fiscal year rollover testing
  • The current ticket: PERF-1016 - Getting issue details... STATUS

Summary

• Running FYR on eureka completed with errors. Tests failed multiple times on overall order rollover with 504 Gateway Time-out issue.
• The problem confirmed on okapi based environment. In scope of investigation of the problem the Time-out was solved changing parameter max_locks_per_transaction in DB configuration from 64 to 1024.
• Eureka based environment (after changes were applied): 
  • #1 Phase Test FYR took 3 hours 35 minutes, completed successfully.
  • #2 Phase actual FYR took 8 hours and completed with errors* (Order rollover Error).
• Okapi based environment (after changes were applied, testing is carried out in scope of investigation to check functionality of FYR):
  
  • #1 Phase Test FYR took 3 hours 20 minutes. Completed successfully.
  • #2 Phase actual FYR took 9 hours 7 minutes. Completed successfully.
• Service CPU utilization for pre-strop to Fiscal Year Rollover (FYR) - Test FYR was less than 5% for all the modules, except a spike at the beginning of test rollover (mod-invoice reached 10%, mod-invoice-storage - 8%). Some modules were steady - mod-inventory - 11%, mod-pubsub - 8%.
• DB CPU usage was on level of 9% during the test rollover and there was growing trend from 9% to 15% during the rollover itself.
• No memory leaks were found.

Recommendations & Jiras

• Set max_locks_per_transaction parameter in DB cluster and instance configurations from default 64 to 1024 to avoid problems with ordersRollover.
• Investigation of issues on Eureka based environment MODFISTO-495 - Getting issue details... STATUS - Time out issue.

Errors

• 127.0.0.1:43264 POST /finance/ledger-rollovers null HTTP_1_1 500 265 400027 tid=[tenant] Internal Server Error. This error happens when we try FYR with more than 10k open orders. The last attempt to run FYR with 50k open orders after changed recommended parameter max_locks_per_transaction failed. A new observation here is that budgets became unavailable with this amount of data. Probably it may cause fail of FYR. 
• * Error message: io.vertx.core.impl.NoStackTraceThrowable: Response status code 401 is not between 200 and 299,qelc2/mod-finance-storage/9044d47f773b48a99cc6c8420864b724 which indicate possible RTR issue.
• WARN [org.fol.sid.ser.rou.RequestMatchingService] (vert.x-eventloop-thread-4) Egress routing entry was not found for the request's path. Forwarding request to the Gateway:moduleId = sc-mod-finance-storage, path = /orders/rollover, destination = https://kong-qelc2.int.aws.folio.org, x-okapi-module-id = null",qelc2/sidecar-mod-finance-storage/9044d47f773b48a99cc6c8420864b724,054267740449:qelc2-folio-eis
  
• ERROR edgerRolloverService handleOrderRolloverError:: Orders rollover failed for ledger f38a29f5-feaa-4363-98a1-1eba79557c9c

Test Runs and Results

Data size: 100K orders (50K orders in open status, 50K - pending), 200K order lines, 400K transactions. 

*Results are taken from the previous test report. Details can be found at the link: [Orchid] Fiscal year rollover testing

*Results are taken from the previous test report. Details can be found at the link: [Poppy] Fiscal year rollover testing

**Data structure can be found at the link: Fiscal year rollover testing

Service CPU Utilization

Note: Instance level CPU screenshots is not included in this report. Taking into account that Fiscal Year Rollover process is mostly happening on DB side - it's barely visible on service CPU, so it's invisible on instance CPU. 

Test FY rollover

Low CPU usage during FYR reflects that it can handle large fiscal year transitions efficiently. As the process runs mostly on database level. 

Maximum CPU utilization by modules:

mod-finance storage - 16% (spike at the beginning)

mod-inventory - 10%

mod-orders, mod-orders-storage - 1,5%, 3%

mod-finance - under 1%

FY rollover

Maximum CPU utilization by modules:

mod-inventory - 11%

mod-orders - 1.5%

mod-orders-storage - 3%

mod-finance - 0.15%

mod-finance storage - 1.2%

Memory Utilization

Test FY rollover

Memory usage by modules:

mod-finance-storage - 85%

mod-finance - 41%

mod-orders - 57%

mod-orders-storage - 46%

FY rollover

Memory usage by modules:

mod-finance-storage - 85%

mod-finance - 42%

mod-orders - 58%

mod-orders-storage - 46%

DB CPU Utilization

Test FY rollover (qelc2)

Maximum DB CPU usage - 9 - 20%

Test FY rollover (qcon)

FY rollover (qelc2)

Maximum DB CPU usage - 99%

FY rollover (qcon)

Spikes are connected to fqm manager queries (as example - REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW CONCURRENTLY cs00000int_0001_mod_fqm_manager.drv_langu...). Do not affect duration of FYR.

DB Connections

Test FY rollover (qelc2)

Test FY rollover (qcon)

FY rollover (qelc2)

FY rollover (qcon)

mod-serials was not paused for the test (because of that we see such connection number increase)

DB Load

Test FY rollover (qcon)

FY rollover (qcon)

Top SQL

Test FY rollover (qcon)

FY rollover (qcon)

Appendix

Infrastructure

PTF -environment qelc2

• 10 m6i.2xlarge EC2 instances located in US East (N. Virginia)us-east-1

• 1 database  instance, writer

  Name	Memory GIB	vCPUs	max_connections
  db.r6g.4xlarge	32 GiB	4 vCPUs	-

• MSK fse-tenant
  
  • 4 m5.2xlarge brokers in 2 zones

  • Apache Kafka version 3.7.x

  • EBS storage volume per broker 300 GiB

  • auto.create.topics.enable=true
  • log.retention.minutes=480
  • default.replication.factor=3

PTF -environment qcon

• 10 m6i.2xlarge EC2 instances located in US East (N. Virginia)us-east-1

• 1 database  instance, writer

  Name	Memory GIB	vCPUs	max_connections
  db.r6g.xlarge	32 GiB	4 vCPUs	-

Methodology/Approach

Files

Before each fiscal year rollover data should be prepared. Data preparation instructions can be found at the link: Steps for testing process#Fiscalyearrollover

• Set max_locks_per_transaction parameter in DB cluster and instance configurations from default 64 to 1024 to avoid problems with ordersRollover.
• Consider using prepared scripts and queries in S3 bucket - Buckets/fse-ptf/FYR/

The difference between Fiscal Year Rollover and Test rollover is that test rollover includes only Finance part of the data. Usual rollover includes also Orders part of the data.