Skip to end of banner
Go to start of banner

2024-02-28 - Criteria for evaluating existing modules

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 2 Next »

Date

Attendees 


Discussion items

TimeItemWhoNotes
1 minScribeAll

Taras Spashchenko followed by Florian Gleixner (Jenn Colt took notes on Monday)

Reminder:  Please copy/paste the Zoom chat into the notes.  If you miss it, this is saved along with the meeting recording, but having it here has benefits. 

*Criteria for evaluating existing modulesAll

Background/Context:  The TCR / New module technical review process was created to evaluate new modules.  It has long been discussed that we should also consider reviewing modules already part of the official Folio releases (Both those which predate these processes, and possibly those which were evaluated, but not reviewed recently).  

Goal:  Review the existing criteria and see which if any need to be removed/adjusted/added for evaluation of existing modules.  The idea is that this will feed into a larger RFC which covers not just the criteria, but also the process, timing, who's respsonsible for what, grace periods, etc.

Notes:

  • ...
NAZoom Chat


  • No labels