Skip to end of banner
Go to start of banner

2021-11-03 Meeting notes

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 2 Next »

Date

Attendees

Discussion items

TimeItemWhoNotes
1 minScribeAll

Raman Auramau is next in the list, followed by Dennis Benndorf 

2 min

Review outstanding action itemsAll
  • No updates
3 minCouncil Goals/ObjectivesAll

Follow-up from previous meetings...

Previous notes:

From Mike Gorrell:

I have created a clean copy of what the Community Council created to identify which FOLIO Goals/Objectives were under the purview of the CC. We also took a stab at what thought would be handled by PC or TC. Please feel free to give us feedback/etc. https://docs.google.com/document/d/17jVxW2XEK2bRSpXG9_FvdVtgqDfCTeKKM5h49IIhmRw/edit#heading=h.m2gdb67ibe1x. and use for your planning purposes.

Update from Tod Olson?

3 minUpgrade/Migration Script Performance

Quick update from Raman Auramau?

20 minExternal Code Submissions
  • A proposal for module submission/evaluation/review/acceptance is ready for review by the TC
    • https://github.com/folio-org/tech-council/blob/master/NEW_MODULE_TECH_EVAL.MD
    • The scope of the proposal is a process for acceptance into an official FOLIO release.
    • The subgroup acknowledges that a process also needs to be defined for acceptance into the FOLIO community resources (Hosted reference envs, CI/CD, platform-complete, etc.).  While related, and also important, this is viewed as out of scope for the Nov 3. proposal.
      • Any volunteers to generate a strawman for this?
    • Jakub Skoczen is working on a strawman for the JIRA workflow (closely tied to the new module technical evaluation process)
  • Acceptance criteria published in the tech-council repo: https://github.com/folio-org/tech-council/blob/master/MODULE_ACCEPTANCE_CRITERIA.MD
    • Still need a presence on the wiki that links to this.
      • Any volunteers?
30 min

Technical Decision Making Process

This is a carry-over from last week.

  • The tech leads group not being a decision making body
  • Whether it's realistic and/or desirable for the TC to make every technical decision
    • There was some overlap here with the external code submission topic

Additional Context: 

For Today:

Time permitting

TC charter review

All

Action items


  • No labels