Skip to end of banner
Go to start of banner

2024-07-17 RFC Process Continued

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 6 Next »

Translator


Date

Attendees 

Discussion items

TimeItemWhoNotes
1 minScribeAll

Jakub Skoczen  is next, followed by Marc Johnson

Julian Ladisch took notes


Reminder:  Please copy/paste the Zoom chat into the notes.  If you miss it, this is saved along with the meeting recording, but having it here has benefits.

30 minEureka RFCsAll
  • Craig: Is the RFC format appropriate for this big change, or could it have been split into smaller RFCs with an overview document for all of them?
  • Jenn: Supporting diagramms are helpful. Other option: Overview RFC linking to detailed documentation.
  • Marc: RFCs can be used to have the discussion and investigating different solutions before the implementation starts; Eureka decisions and development has started before the RFC was created allowing for only yes/no decision.
  • Jason and Marc: Both ways are possible.
20 minRFCs in the wikiAll
  • adapt the RFC process to use the wiki
Time PermittingAdditional RFC process feedback Tod Olson

From Tod in slack:

I think we want to be clear about what kinds of communication and coordination we need to facilitate. That is, what kinds of agreements do we need about how FOLIO behaves at the technical level. And where have we had problems because of not having common agreements or breaking those agreements.


Notes:

  • ...
NAZoom Chat





  • No labels