Skip to end of banner
Go to start of banner

2017-06-23 - Consortia SIG Notes

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 6 Current »

Date

Attendees

Goals

  • understand status of and thinking surrounding user management
  • identify consortial implications and share with UM SIG

Discussion items

TimeItemWhoNotes
45mins

User Management discussion with Chris Manly

All

UM SIG overview

Current points of discussion

  • SSO
    • focuse on Shibboleth integration
    • likely to be a need for first implementers
    • also ability to have local user authentication
    • what happens to SSO users with no privileges (and stumble on FOLIO)
  • bulk user import
    • focusing on transactional API to create/modify user in one step
    • assumption that sources of users will vary greatly
    • what happens when record comes in from feed on record that has been manually edited?
      • under discussion; protected fields
    • JSON as data format

Consortial considerations

  • metadata field requirements
    • what fields are repeatable?
      • addresses and notes
      • for consortia, patrons need to belong to multiple patron groups
        • single patron record with multiple barcodes use case; this isn't accounted for in FOLIO currently
  • are we working with a one library per tenant model?
    • tenant awareness to define consortial relationships
    • need to not put the responsibility on the user to choose
      • how do you map users from one tenant to another? "consortia broker module" to handle mapping
    • this model might make it easier to represent multiple consortial relationships
      • observed increase in informal consortial relationships/partnerships
    • makes it easier to sever relationships too
  • bulk import
    • handle multiple feed sources
    • documentation of required format for FOLIO
    • possible area of app development ("the MarcEdit of user records")
  • super user - needs to be able to transcend tenants
    • other staff might need to transcend tenants too
  • tenant/library relationship seems like a pretty fundamental thing to figure out
10mins

Resource access requirements preview for next meeting

  • organization level
All

David Dahl will work on scheduling someone from RA (probably Andrea) to join next week or the week following.

5minsNew meeting time progressDavidLooking like Wednesdays 9-10am Eastern is going to be the new meeting time. Waiting on a couple more responses.

Action items

  • All - review Resource Access requirements for discussion at next meeting
  • David Dahl - schedule RA representation for upcoming meeting
  • No labels