Date
Attendees
- Andrea Loigman
- Cornelia Awenius
- Cornelia Davis
- (OLD ACCOUNT) Erin Nettifee
- Anne L. Highsmith
- Cate Boerema (Deactivated)
- Emma Boettcher
- David Bottorff
- Mark Canney
- Darcy Branchini
- Anya
- Donna Minor
- Joanne Leary
- Holly Mistlebauer
- @karen Mehl
- Laurence Mini
- Cheryl Malmborg
- @hb Kouns
- Kimie Kester
- Brooks Travis
- @Shirley Moentnish
- mey
- Monica Arnold
Discussion Items
| Time | Item | Who | Description | Goals/Info |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2min | Administrivia | Andrea Loigman |
| |
| 20min | Notices | Tokens for fee/fine notices | Questions regarding which item and/or loan tokens should be available and separating charge from action tokens. | |
| 20min | Anonymization | Emma Boettcher | Anonymization of claimed returned items | Decide if this is a separate setting to other anonymization settings |
| 15min | Due dates | Anya | Not naming/renaming the fixed due date schedule data entry table |
Meeting Outcomes
Functional Area | Product Owner | Planned Release (if known) | Decision Reached | Reasoning | Link to supporting materials | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| e.g. loans, fees/fines | Name | e.g. Q4 2018, Q1 2019 | Clearly stated decision |
| e.g. mock-up, JIRA issue | |
| Loans | Emma Boettcher | Q2 2020 | Don't automatically put in link to loan in user record note for a claimed returned item unless there is a tenant-level way to configure those links not being added | GDPR compliance | ||
Notes
fee/fine screen displays more information than fee/fine record, should addtional information be also available for fee/fine notices?
full call number information, enumeration etc should be available for notice tokens
is there a way to state that fine was caused by someone recalling the item? it should be
date and dateTime are both needed
additionalInfo is from manual charges
multiple charge notices won't be available first, but multiple action notices will
multiple actions can be summarized in one notice or sent separately
new function to include note on user record that an item was claimed returned - does this need to be anonymized?
This is really about what happens when the loan goes to missing. If it's declared lost, then the anonymization is governed by associated fee/fines.
If loan ID is included in the note, does that help? What about GDPR concerns?
Andrea - more concerned about claim returned and then we found it. That history is important from a customer service perspective.
GDPR concerns, possibility to turn it off? Yes, we would want that, or the ability to anonymize the note, or both.
if the note is done manually, barcode or title could be included instead of loan id
Emma - that seems like the right approach, until the ability to turn it off would be in place.
Andrea - yes, because the loan should eventually have the notice history as well, which is key for when you need this information.
Topics for Thursdays?
Cheryl - I'd still like to explore manual fee/fines and automated overdue notices, since I'm still confused.
Erin - you're not the only one who is still confused.
Anya - I'll ping Darcy and Holly to discuss whether that could be covered on Thursday.
cision: