Skip to end of banner
Go to start of banner

2019-1-24 Resource Access Meeting Notes

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 11 Next »

Date

Attendees

Discussion tems

TimeItemWhoDescriptionGoals
10minHousekeeping
  • Notetaker - Mark Canney
  • Dev meeting in Ipswich in early May.
  • Do we need really need a F2F? Why and what needs discussing?
45minReportsEmma BoettcherIn-app reports (general) & overdue loans report (specifically)Solicit feedback on in-app report mechanism, using the example of overdue loans.

Meeting Outcomes

Functional Area

Product Owner

Planned Release (if known)

Decision Reached

Reasoning

Link to Supporting Materials

Comments

e.g. loans, fees/finesNamee.g. Q4 2018, Q1 2019Clearly stated decision
  • Because...
  • Because...
e.g. mock-up, JIRA issue
LoansEmma BoettcherQ1 2019

Additional specs gathered for in-app reports


  • Because external reporting tools offer flexibility
  • Because staff shouldn't have to switch systems to accomplish daily work
Slides

May need to retrieve (for example) loans by patron group or by patron ID

Different desks may run the same report but change one factor (the desk or location)

Having private, individual reports in addition to the institution-level ones

"Run report" button does not have to be on the same screen as setting up the report








Notes

  • No labels