Skip to end of banner
Go to start of banner

2017-06-012 Resource Access Meeting Notes

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 3 Next »

Date

Attendees

Goals

Discussion items

TimeItemWhoNotes
5 minAndreaHousekeeping
  • Note-taker
?Cate, Harry and/or VinceLocations continued
  • Collective collections
  • Consortia
  • Floating collections

Notes

Housekeeping:  No meetings on 6/22 & 26 (ALA) but will meet while Andrea is on vacation (enjoy!) with Cate as our convener.

Location discussion with Harry, Vince and Cate

  • Number of levels:
    • 5, not all need to be configured
    • VZG libraries currently use 5
    • Is having 5 levels a workaround from past systems or needed? 
    • Would it be better to have 5 right now instead of trying to add one later
    • trying to prepare ourselves for the future and flexibilities
    • locations have to be associated with a circ desk so you know when an item is “home”
    • Need to keep home location when adding a temp location

 

  • Level Descriptions:
    • each institution will want to define and name their own levels
    • so name conventions could be Level A,B,C or Level 1,2,3

 

  • Consortia needs: 
    • Has not yet been discussed in Consortia SIG
    • many libraries are in more than one consortia
    •  how can this be handled
    • Is there a level above consortia?
    • Sits apart from institution

 

  • Collections:
    • Is collections more of a concept?
    • Location as a purpose? 
    • Workflow as context
    • What would happen if “collection” were not part of location hierarch?
    • What would that do to loan rules?
    • Adding another factor in loan rules (5 instead of 4) would make it more difficult

Seems reasonable to have a level between library and shelving but what would that be?

Will pick up discussion on Monday’s meeting

 

  • No labels