Skip to end of banner

Go to start of banner

Check-in-check-out Test with parallel requests(Lotus)

Skip to end of metadata

Created by Olga Kondratenko, last modified on Jul 15, 2022

Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

Overview

This is a report for the Check-in-check-out test with parallel requests running against the Lotus release.

Back End:

mod-circulation-23.0.8
mod-circulation-storage-14.0.0
mod-inventory-18.1.6
mod-inventory-storage-23.0.2
mod-authtoken-2.9.1
mod-pubsub-2.5.0
mod-patron-blocks-1.5.2
mod-feesfines-17.1.1
okapi-4.13.2

Test Runs

The test with parallel requests uses more RAM so the load generator should be configurated

Test	Virtual Users	Duration	Load generator size (recommended)	Memory (GiB) (recommended)
1.	1	30 mins	t3.medium	3
2.	5	30 mins	t3.medium	4
3.	8	30 mins	t3.large	5
4.	20	30 mins	t3.large	8
5.	50	30 mins	t3.2xlarge	21

Response Times comparison (Average of all tests listed above, in seconds)

	Average (seconds)				50th %tile (seconds)
	Check-in	Check-in parallel	Check-out	Check-out parallel	Check-in	Check-in parallel	Check-out	Check-out parallel
1 user	0.73	0.544	1.188	0.93	0.682	0.516	1.084	0.855
5 users	0.62	0.409	0.976	0.692	0.582	0.38	0.915	0.637
8 users	0.615	0.4	0.971	0.679	0.581	0.372	0.904	0.627
20 users	0.661	0.437	1.052	0.741	0.62	0.392	0.967	0.657
50 users		0.619		1.127		0.484		0.882

	75th %tile (seconds)				95th %tile (seconds)
	Check-in	Check-in parallel	Check-out	Check-out parallel	Check-in	Check-in parallel	Check-out	Check-out parallel
1 user	0.774	0.591	1.24	0.995	1	0.765	1.812	1.454
5 users	0.662	0.422	1.02	0.723	0.844	0.552	1.44	1.043
8 users	0.654	0.413	1.006	0.707	0.836	0.536	1.428	1.008
20 users	0.702	0.453	1.107	0.759	0.918	0.632	1.593	1.152
50 users		0.668		1.221		1.195		2.184

Test results in Grafana

5 users

http://carrier-io.int.folio.ebsco.com/grafana/d/elIt9zCnz/jmeter-performance-test-copy?orgId=1&from=1657697555630&to=1657699537916&var-percentile=95&var-test_type=baseline&var-test=circulation_checkInCheckOut&var-env=int&var-grouping=1s&var-low_limit=250&var-high_limit=750&var-db_name=jmeter&var-sampler_type=All

8 users

http://carrier-io.int.folio.ebsco.com/grafana/d/elIt9zCnz/jmeter-performance-test-copy?orgId=1&from=1657699973864&to=1657701937872&var-percentile=95&var-test_type=baseline&var-test=circulation_checkInCheckOut_parallel1&var-env=int&var-grouping=1s&var-low_limit=250&var-high_limit=750&var-db_name=jmeter&var-sampler_type=All

20 users

http://carrier-io.int.folio.ebsco.com/grafana/d/elIt9zCnz/jmeter-performance-test-copy?orgId=1&from=1657723317000&to=1657725100360&var-percentile=95&var-test_type=baseline&var-test=circulation_checkInCheckOut_parallel1&var-env=int&var-grouping=1s&var-low_limit=250&var-high_limit=750&var-db_name=jmeter&var-sampler_type=All

50 users

http://carrier-io.int.folio.ebsco.com/grafana/d/elIt9zCnz/jmeter-performance-test-copy?orgId=1&from=1657730712018&to=1657732987800&var-percentile=95&var-test_type=baseline&var-test=circulation_checkInCheckOut_parallel1&var-env=int&var-grouping=1s&var-low_limit=250&var-high_limit=750&var-db_name=jmeter&var-sampler_type=All

Modules and instances CPUs and Memory Utilization

Database and Network

No labels