Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Date

...

Discussion tems

Decision: What parts should be displayed and if elements should be concatenated and displayed as a single field
TimeItemWhoDescriptionGoals
5minHousekeeping
  • Notetaker - Deb Lamb
  • FOLIO Forum - Call for committee member

10minRenewals for 'fixed' loanssthomas (Deactivated)Continued from last meeting - clarification needed from ChicagoDecision: How to handle Fixed Due Date loans with renewals. While fixed loans are renewable, there is no notion now of a renewal length for a fixed loan. The option of 'alternate fixed due date for renewals' would only work for the first renewal. Affects renewal override effort as well.
10minFixed due date schedule maintenance and affect on fixed term loan policiessthomas (Deactivated)Continued from last meeting - clarification needed from ChicagoDiscussion: How fixed due date schedules and policies for fixed loans are maintained in practice. Decision: What, if any, additional functionality is needed to accommodate fixed loans made at or near fixed-term-end dates?10 minStaff slipsCall number display
30minRush recallsCate Boerema (Deactivated)
Would like to discuss a general approach for handling the rush recall workflow so I can get a UXPROD feature written up. Also, do rush recalls need special policy settings (such as pickup and delivery options that differ from the norm)? What policy settings would they need in the loan policy form?

...

Functional Area

Product Owner

Planned Release (if known)

Decision Reached

Reasoning

Link to Supporting Materials

Comments

e.g. loans, fees/finesNamee.g. Q4 2018, Q1 2019Clearly stated decision
  • Because...
  • Because...
e.g. mock-up, JIRA issue
RequestsCate Boerema (Deactivated)TBDHigh-level requirements for Staff/Admin/Rush Recall feature

Notes from discussion

Newly created UXPROD feature:

Jira Legacy
serverSystem JIRA
serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
keyUXPROD-1409









Notes

1.   Sharon Wiles-Young:  Still looking for someone from the RA- SIG to join the Forum Facilitators.  Meetings are Wednesday afternoons and they do not meet if there is no agenda.  This group creates new ideas for upcoming Forums and looks for hosts.  The term is 1 year.  Please consider this!

2.  Sean: Decision: How to handle Fixed Due Date loans with renewals. While fixed loans are renewable, there is no notion now of a renewal length for a fixed loan. The option of 'alternate fixed due date for renewals' would only work for the first renewal. Affects renewal override effort as well.  Chicago Folks clarified their fixed due date schedules and how it works with the circ rules.  They do not use “alternative renewals”.  Much discussion but in the end, we decided we were good!

3. Sean:  Discussion: How fixed due date schedules and policies for fixed loans are maintained in practice. Decision: What, if any, additional functionality is needed to accommodate fixed loans made at or near fixed-term-end dates?  Discussion centered around recalls and minimum loan periods.  We agreed we do not have to have a minimum loan guarantee in settings.  Staff recalls were also discussed (see next topic for more discussion on this).  Would be nice to have an error message if the minimum loan period and the fixed date disagree of is wrong.  Perhaps an error message in the calendar function – not a V. 1 issue.

4.  Cate: Would like to discuss a general approach for handling the rush recall workflow so I can get a UXPROD feature written up. Also, do rush recalls need special policy settings (such as pickup and delivery options that differ from the norm)? What policy settings would they need in the loan policy form?  Please see Cate’s excellent notes on this for the outcomes.