Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Page Properties


Submitted Date

 

Approved Dateyyyy-mm-dd

 

StatusACCEPTED
ImpactHIGH/MEDIUM/LOW


 


Overrides/Supersedes 

When applicable, provide links to all DRs that this DR overrides or supersedes 

RFC 

Provide links to all relevant RFC's

Stakeholders

@mention individual(s) who has vested interest in the DR. This helps us to identify who needs to be aware of the decision

Contributors

List individual(s) sposnoring/advocating for the decisionThis decision was migrated from the Tech Leads Decision Log as part of a consolidation process.  The original decision record can be found here.

RFC 

N/A

Stakeholders

  • Platform team members
  • interested Tech Leads

Contributors

Jakub Skoczen 

Approvers

This decision was made by the Tech Leads group prior to the adoption of current decision making processes within the FOLIO project.

...

Explain the need that triggered the need for making a decision

Assumptions

List all assumptions that were made when making the decision

Constraints

List any constraints that lead us to make a certain decision

Rationale

Document the thought process, list reasons that lead to the final decision

Decision

Short summary of the decision goes here

Implications

  • Pros
    • Provide a link to RFC when applicable
  • Cons
    • Provide a link to RFC when applicable

Other Related ResourcesN/A

Constraints

N/A

Rationale

N/A

Decision

Platform team would like to pursue Option 2 of the proposal covered in Image AddedRMB-719 - SPIKE: design protocol and implementation for optimistic lockingCLOSED. There is an open question regarding requirements and they are being discussed with the POs (AM, Dennis, Charlotte). Please refer to the Optimistic locking proposal for further details

Implications

  • Pros
    • N/A
  • Cons
    • N/A


Other Related Resources