Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Date

Attendees

Discussion items

ItemWhoNotes
Minute taker?Kristen Wilson

Announcements/Updates

Product Council Minutes  

PC Updates

  • Unam – dev team from Mexican consortium working on fees and fines is having to reorganize their work
  • There's also a change in developers for the ERM team – half time Cornell developer can no longer participate
  • Mike Gorrell gave a presentation on technical debt, which is linked from the minutes
  • The Implementers Group is encouraging people to contribute to the Information, Tips, and Tricks pages on the wiki: Individual Apps - Information, Tips, and Tricks
  • What can RM contribute?
  • The Implementers are also working on a spreadsheet of integrations. It's more institution-focused for now, but topics may come to the SIGs as it progresses.
Fiscal Year Roll Over
  • Putting the fun in funds!
  • FYRO features are not currently marked as cap-mvp, but it makes sense to understand the process in the context of work on transactions.
  • Rollover will happen for a ledger, and in turn all of the funds in that ledger
  • Once the rollover process starts, there will be several actions available:
  • Choose the dates of the next fiscal year
  • Choose whether to restrict encumbrances and expenditures (allows spending on $0 budgets while waiting for final numbers)
  • Set the planned budget for each fund type in the new FY – several options:
    • Rollover last year's allocations (or a percentage)
    • Rollover available balance
    • Set allowed encumbrances and expenditures
  • Q: If you choose to not restrict expenditures, can you turn this off later?
    • Yes, you can update the setting at the ledger level at any point in time
    • The ledger-level settings will override any fund-level settings
  • Set encumbrance behavior for open orders
    • Can set for ongoing orders, subscription orders, and one-time orders 
    • Choose whether to rollover the encumbrance
    • Rollover encumbrance based on initial encumbrance or total expenditure
    • Increase encumbrances by a percentage
  • Once rollover is complete, all current fiscal year budgets will be marked inactive.
  • Q: How many funds are associated with a ledger
    • Each ledger can have one or more funds
    • Each fund can only belong to one ledger
    • Multiple ledgers might be useful for multiple campuses or branches, e vs p funds, or one-time vs. ongoing funds
  • Q: How do you add new funds to a FY?
    • You can add funds with a $0 balance, then roll them over and give them allocations.
    • You can also do rollover first, then add new funds and allocations individually.
  • Q: How do you decrease the budget for an individual fund?
    • After rollover, you can edit the allocation for a single fund individually
  • Q: What's the difference between a type and a group?
    • Groups can cross ledgers and are used to show an aggregate view of a group of funds.
    • Groups are not required.
    • A fund can belong to multiple groups.
    • Types are categories use to create subsets within ledgers.
    • Types are use to rollover funds
    • A fund can only have one type.
  • Q: What happens if you rollover an encumbrance on a fund that has no allocation?
    • When you try to pay the invoice, you will be stopped by the system if no funds are available.
  • Q: Is there a way to set up funds where there is no allocation, but unlimited spending is allowed?
    • We will need to add in an option to mark individual funds "Do not restrict"
    • Currently that setting is only at the ledger lever.
  • Q: Will there be an error log?
    • There will be an audit process, but more work is needed to decide how to implement it.
  • Q: Will there be pre- and post-rollover reports to create a record of expenditures and confirm that the rollover results were as expected?
    • There might be a need for an in-app report
    • You can also use the search and filter options as a workaround
Purchase Order Line: fields divided by format
  • An issue that's come up at Chicago when mapping existing POs to FOLIO
  • There are separate price and quantity fields for print and electronic formats
  • There are also separate physical and electronic resource details
  • Worries about complexity for mapping and reporting
  • Once the order is open, these values can't be changed
  • Owen also suggested that there are similar issues at play with Agreements
  • More discussion will be needed
  • Chicago is having a "PO Workshop" next week for testing – that may help resolve or raise questions
  • Are there any libraries that need to have their encumbrances separated by format? Why did we decide to separate cost information?
    • The cost details on the PO are actually not the encumbrances
    • P price, e price, discounts, etc. are tallied to get a total estimated price.
    • The encumbrance is generated by the fund distribution
  • People should think about these issues and bring questions back to the group

Action items

  •