Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Page Properties


Submitted DateTBD
Approved Date
StatusDRAFT
ImpactHIGH


 

Overrides/Supersedes 

N/A

RFC 

N/A

Stakeholders

@mention individual(s) who has vested interest in the DR. This helps us to identify who needs to be aware of the decision

Contributors

Radhakrishnan Gopalakrishnan 

Approvers

List TC members voted to approve the change

Background/Context

Explain the need that triggered the need for making a decision

Assumptions

List all assumptions that were made when making the decision

Constraints

List any constraints that lead us to make a certain decision

Rationale

Document the thought process, list reasons that lead to the final decisionRefer to the Assumptions section of the process document

Constraints

N/A

Rationale

Refer to the Objectives section of the process document

Decision

Following are the key decision points related to the process

  • Tools/Technologies/Frameworks WILL be assigned an owner
  • Component owner works with release coordinator to create tickets within the scope of the release and the teams will  come with execution plan and decide on committing to the work 
  • TC will review/weigh in/approve plans for major infrastructure components and shared tooling

Implications

  • Pros
    • Provide a link to RFC when applicableN/A
  • Cons
    • Provide a link to RFC when applicableN/A


Other Related Resources

Component Owners

Managing Tools/Frameworks/Dependencies Version - v0.2 DRAFT