Table of Contents outline true
Overview
- This document contains the results of testing Data testing Check-in/Check-out and Data Import for MARC Bibliographic records with an update job on the Quesnelia [ECS] release on qcon environment.
Jira Legacy | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Summary
- Data Import with Check In/Check Out tests finished successfully on qcon environment using the PTF - Create 2 and PTF - Updates Success - 2 profile and file with 25k records profiles with files 5K, 10K, 25K, 50K, 100K records.
- Comparing with previous testing results Poppy and Quesnelia releases
- Data Import processed all jobs including test on 3 tenants concurrently without errors durations for create jobs has performance degradation in Average up to 10% for Quesnelia releases.
- Data Import durations stayed in the same time range in Average for Quesnelia releases but it works stable and without errorsdurations for update jobs has performance degradation in Average up to 40% for Quesnelia releases.
- Check In/Check Out Response time has slight improvement in Average up to 10% for Quesnelia releases.
- During testing, we noticed that mod-permission did not have any spikes and used 12% data-import module used maximum 57% CPU for Quesnelia releases. For Poppy releases we had errorwe mod-data-import module used 130% CPU and 320% in spike.
- No memory leaks are observed.
Test Runs
Test № | Scenario | Test Conditions | Results |
---|---|---|---|
1 | DI MARC Bib Create | 5K, 10K, 25K, 50K, 100K consequentially (with 5 min pause) | Completed |
CICO | 8 users | ||
2 | DI MARC Bib Update | 5K, 10K, 25K, 50K, 100K consequentially (with 5 min pause) |
|
CICO | 8 users |
...
Profile | MARC File | DI Duration Quesnelia (hh:mm:ss) | Check In, Check Out Response time (8 users) Quesnelia | |
---|---|---|---|---|
CI Average sec | CO Average sec | |||
DI MARC Bib Create (PTF - Create 2) | 5K.mrc | 0:03:21 | 0.831 | 1.357 |
10K.mrc | 0:06:51 | 0.845 | 1.410 | |
25K.mrc | 0:12:41 | 0.719 | 1.333 | |
50K.mrc | 0:23:19 | 0.691 | 1.327 | |
100K.mrc | 0:51:24 | 0.664 | 1.335 | |
DI MARC Bib Create (PTF - Updates Success - 2) | 5K.mrc | 0:04:12 | 0.764 | 1.458 |
10K.mrc | 0:08:15 | 0.779 | 1.377 | |
25K.mrc | 0:20:38 | 0.755 | 1.401 | |
50K.mrc | 0:43:06 | 0.750 | 1.444 | |
100K.mrc | 1:29:09 | 0.730 | 1.458 |
Check-in/Check-out without DI
Scenario | Load level | Request | Response time, sec Quesnelia | |
---|---|---|---|---|
95 perc | average | |||
Circulation Check-in/Check-out (without Data import) | 8 users | Check-in | 0.635 | 0.493 |
Check-out | 1.243 | 1.078 |
Comparison
This table contains DI durations with CICO comparison between Poppy and Quesnelia releases.
Profile | MARC File | DI Durationwith CI/CO | DI Delta Poppy/Quesnelia (hh:mm:ss / %) | Check In, Check Out Response time (8 users) | Check In, Check Out Response time (8 users) | Delta, % | ||||
Poppy | Quesnelia | Poppy/Quesnelia | Poppy/Quesnelia | |||||||
Poppy | Quesnelia | CI Average sec | CO Average sec | CI Average sec | CO Average sec | CI | CO | |||
DI MARC Bib Create (PTF - Create 2) | 5K.mrc | 00:02:53 | 0:03:21 | +0:00:28 |
/ +16.18% | 0.901 | 1.375 | 0.831 | 1.357 | -7.77% | -1.31% | |||
10K.mrc | 00:04:32 | 0:06:51 | +0:02:19/ +51.10% | 0.902 | 1.47 | 0.845 | 1.410 | -6.32% | -4.08% |
25K.mrc | 00:11:14 | 0:12:41 | +0:01:27 |
/ +12.91% | 1 | 1.571 | 0.719 | 1.333 | -28.1% | -15.15% |
50K.mrc | 00: |
21: |
55 | 0: |
23: |
19 | +0: |
DI MARC Bib Create
(PTF - Updates Success - 2)
01:24 / +6.39% | 0.981 | 1.46 | 0.691 | 1.327 | -29.57% | -9.11% |
100K.mrc | 00: |
47: |
02 | 0: |
51: |
24 | +0: |
04:22 / +9.28% | 1.018 | 1.491 | 0.664 | 1.335 | -34.78% | -10.47% |
DI MARC Bib Create (PTF - U1.571pdates Success - 2) | 5K.mrc | 00: |
03: |
19 | 0: |
04: |
12 | +0: |
00:53 /+26.63% | 0.755 | 1.169 | 0.764 | 1.458 | +1.19% | +24.73% |
10K.mrc |
00: |
06: |
20 |
0: |
08: |
15 | +0: |
Detailed CICO response time comparison without DI
Poppy
Quesnelia
Detailed CICO response time comparison for CICO with DI in Poppy
01:55 / +30.26% | 0.75 | 1.307 | 0.779 | 1.377 | +3.87% | +5.36% | |||
25K.mrc | 00:14:04 | 0:20:38 | +0:06:34 / +46.68% | 0.822 | 1.403 | 0.755 | 1.401 | -8.15% | -0.14% |
50K.mrc | 00:29:59 | 0:43:06 | +0:13:07 / +43.74% | 0.893 | 1.424 | 0.750 | 1.444 | -16.01% | +1.40% |
100K.mrc | 01:03:03 | 1:29:09 | +0:26:06 / +41.40% | 0.908 | 1.51 | 0.730 | 1.458 | -19.60% | -3.44% |
Detailed CICO response time comparison without DI
Scenario | Load level | Request | Response time, sec Poppy | Response time, sec Quesnelia | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
95 perc | average | 95 perc | average | |||
Circulation Check-in/Check-out (without Data import) | 8 users | Check-in | 0.489 | 0.431 | 0.635 | 0.493 |
Check-out | 0.969 | 0.828 | 1.243 | 1.078 |
Resource utilization for Test №1
...
Expand | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
...
PTF - environment Quesnelia (qcon)
11 m6i10 m6i.2xlarge EC2 instances located in US East (N. Virginia)us-east-1 [Number of ECS instances, instance type, location region]
1 instance of db.r6.xlarge database instance: Writer instance
OpenSearch
domain: fse
Number of nodes: 96
Version: OpenSearch_2_7_R20240502
MSK - tenat
4 kafka.m5.2xlarge brokers in 2 zones
Apache Kafka version 2.8.0
EBS storage volume per broker 300 GiB
auto.create.topics.enable=true
log.retention.minutes=480
default.replication.factor=3
Kafka consolidated topics enabled
...
...
- Test 1: Manually tested 5K, 10K, 25K, 50K, 100K consequentially (with 5 min pause) records files, DI (DI MARC Bib Create ) started on College tenant(cs00000int_0001) only, and CICO with 8 users on background.
- Test 2: Manually tested 5K, 10K, 25K, 50K, 100K consequentially (with 5 min pause) records files, DI (DI MARC Bib Update) started on College tenant(cs00000int_0001) only, and CICO with 8 users on background.
At the time of the test run, Grafana was not available. As a result, response times for Check-In/Check-Out were parsed manually from a .jtl files, using the start and finish dates of the data import tests. These results were visualized in JMeter using a Listener (Response Times Over Time).