Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Page Properties


Submitted Dateyyyy-mm-dd

 

Approved Dateyyyy-mm-dd

 

StatusACCEPTED
ImpactTBDLOW


 

Overrides/Supersedes 

When applicable, provide links to all DRs that this DR overrides or supersedes 

RFC 

Provide links to all relevant RFC's

Stakeholders

@mention individual(s) who has vested interest in the DR. This helps us to identify who needs to be aware of the decisionThis decision was migrated from the Tech Leads Decision Log as part of a consolidation process.  The original decision record can be found here.

RFC 

N/A

Stakeholders

All Backend Developers

Contributors

Anton Emelianov (Deactivated) 

Approvers

List TC members voted to approve the change

Background/Context

...

This decision was made by the Tech Leads group prior to the adoption of current decision making processes within the FOLIO project.

Background/Context

Some bugs can only be discovered by integrating modules together. It is challenging to identify these on an ongoing basis.Some integration tests were already implemented. They use Postman collections. They are simple to write but harder to maintain. It can be challenging to express more complex scenarios. Many of which were contributed by ThunderJet team.

Assumptions

List all assumptions that were made when making the decision

Constraints

List any constraints that lead us to make a certain decision

Rationale

Document the thought process, list reasons that lead to the final decisionN/A

Rationale

ThunderJet teams has considered a range of tools and recommend Karate tool.

No alternative  proposals has been submitted  therefore Karate framework is preferred method for creating API integration tests in 2020.

Decision

Use Karate test framework for writing integration tests


Implications

  • Pros
    • Provide a link to RFC when applicableN/A
  • Cons
    • Provide a link to RFC when applicableN/A


Other Related Resources