Page Comparison

Steffen Köhler is next in the list

Marc Johnson

Julian Ladisch

Follow-up from last week... 

Proposal from Marc Johnson: https://wiki.folio.org/display/~marcjohnson/Check+Out+Performance

Proposal from Julian Ladisch: https://wiki.folio.org/display/DD/Check+Out+Performance

Marc Johnson was asked to make a proposal for checking out performance; draft document is available by the first link above. Feedback is appreciated

There's a link to PTF analysis from the first mentioned doc

The Capacity Planning Team has determined that we should proceed with the caching approach. The feature UXPROD-3317 "Improve checkout performance by caching data" and 19 stories with priority P1 (linked from the UXPROD-3317 feature) have been created.

Ian Walls/All

• Ongoing work on Acceptance Criteria and Processes (submission, evaluation, etc.)
  • Has the Acceptance Criteria v1.0 been published somewhere yet?  What about references/links in other places.
    • Will pick a Github repo and deposit it later (Jakub)
    • Tod Olson RC might be a good choice
  • Agree on short and long term goals, will continue to work on:
    
    • Define processes for submission, evaluation, review, feedback, acceptance
    • Improve the AC with more verifiable criteria, links to supporting documentation, etc.
    • Time frame: Ian and Jakub will take a look at Lotus dates and inform the team next week
  • LDP Review: reach out to Jeremy Huff and Nassib Nassar and sort out this by today

Follow-up from last week... 

Previous notes:

From Mike Gorrell:

I have created a clean copy of what the Community Council created to identify which FOLIO Goals/Objectives were under the purview of the CC. We also took a stab at what thought would be handled by PC or TC. Please feel free to give us feedback/etc. https://docs.google.com/document/d/17jVxW2XEK2bRSpXG9_FvdVtgqDfCTeKKM5h49IIhmRw/edit#heading=h.m2gdb67ibe1x. and use for your planning purposes.

The goal here is to introduce this and get eyes on itUpdate from Tod Olson, Jeremy Huff, Craig McNally who met to discuss this last Friday.

• The Friday meetings will be at 11am EST, please join if you can.

Marc Johnson

Follow-up from last week... 

Proposal from Marc Johnson: https://folio-org.atlassian.net/wiki/display/~marcjohnson/Check+Out+Performance

Marc Johnson was asked to make a proposal for checking out performance; draft document is available by the first link above. Feedback is appreciated

There's a link to PTF analysis from the first mentioned doc

Julian Ladisch

This is a carry-over from several weeks ago.  It was a tangent of the min.io/S3 conversation that started to delve into topics of:

• The tech leads group not being a decision making body
• Whether it's realistic and/or desirable for the TC to make every technical decision
  • There was some overlap here with the external code submission topic

Related - in the wake of last week's slack vote:

• Revisit voting rules... simple vs super majority, voting via slack, abstentions, quorum, etc.:
  • quorum: 8 (tie is no, so minimum 5 votes to pass)
    
  • simple majority: yes
  • of vote casted (including abstentions): yes
    
  • Abstain: Yes
    
  • Delegate: Yes
    
  • voting via slack: No, it has to be in person only
    
  • etc.
• Let's start with voting process

NOTE: We need to frame this conversation and agree upon what we're trying to accomplish and how much time we want to dedicate to it before diving in.

Ian Walls/All

in

.