...
Attendees
- Anya
- Jana Freytag
- Emma Boettcher
- Mark Canney
- Cheryl Malmborg
- Cate Boerema (Deactivated)
- David Bottorff
- Joanne Leary
- Wendy Wilcox
- Rameka Barnes
- Kimie Kester
- Darcy Branchini
- Julie Petzold
- Tania Hewes
- William Weare
Discussion items
| Time | Item | Who | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5min | Housekeeping |
| |
| 20min | Mapping fine/fee to locations | ||
| 20min | Permissions for fine/fee | ||
| 10min | Workflow engine update | Cate Boerema (Deactivated) |
Notes
- Mapping fee/fine to locations
- Permissions for the settings (fee/fines)
- David: Settings vs. permissions for only a few people
- Owner Level: balances/time etc. should be at the level of the Main Library circ desk
- Policies
- you need different permissions to connect to loan rules
- do not trump the loan rules
- Question Cate: What does it mean to have a consortium?
- Idea: a cross tenant-principle could solve it
- either you have the permission to change the fees/fines or not
- Mock-ups:
- charging manual fees/fines
- fee-fine owner drop down menus
- manual charges
- David: Examples fo not apply to lost book fees because it is a different process
- automated fees/fines
- overdue fines
- lost item fines
- age to lost
- etc.
- the moment the item is checked in it would know which service desk & selfing locations / which fee-/fine- owner
- the belonging of the item ist more important then the association
- selections for fee/fines (e.g.: everything from one location goes to another)
- multiple service desks with multiple fee/fine owners
- special collections might have different approaches to it
- reminder fees/notices - Holly has them in mind for the next steps
- charging manual fees/fines
- Cate on an update for the workflow engine:
- Index data is doing a survey on the workflow engine
- POs should look at features which would benefit from the workflow engine
...