Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...


Discussion items

TimeItemWhoNotes
1 minScribeAll

Taras Spashchenko followed by Florian Gleixner (Jenn Colt took notes on Monday)

Reminder:  Please copy/paste the Zoom chat into the notes.  If you miss it, this is saved along with the meeting recording, but having it here has benefits. 

*Criteria for evaluating existing modulesAll

Background/Context:  The TCR / New module technical review process was created to evaluate new modules.  It has long been discussed that we should also consider reviewing modules already part of the official Folio releases (Both those which predate these processes, and possibly those which were evaluated, but not reviewed recently).  

Goal:  Review the existing criteria and see which if any need to be removed/adjusted/added for evaluation of existing modules.  The idea is that this will feed into a larger RFC which covers not just the criteria, but also the process, timing, who's respsonsible for what, grace periods, etc.

Notes:

  • ...
NAZoom Chat

Jenn Colt 11:14 AM
At the risk of hopeless quagmire some of the existing module stuff could almost be owned by PC, like accessibility and privacy concerns.

Tod Olson to Everyone 11:34 AM
I need to drop off. I do think these late bullet points are really good for review, checking the QA gates.

Jenn Colt to Everyone 11:50 AM
This was from the lists app thing. Maybe someone already said that.

Maccabee Levine to Everyone 11:50 AM
Like mod-camunda requires camunda :)

Maccabee Levine to Everyone 11:50 AM
if it were submitted for TCR

You 11:53 AM
https://github.com/folio-org/tech-council/compare/master...existing-module-evals

...