...
| Item | Who | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Meeting times, communication protocols | Based on this document - discuss recommendations and questions Would Discuss be a good tool for us?
Meeting times: stagger to accommodate time zones Limit calls to once a month - Probably too early to consider this now Have recordings As FOLIO expands geographically more asynchronous communication would be better This is becoming an issue for the SIGs also - discussion about whether to talk to the SIGs about this, encouraging them to use Discuss - or does this belong to PC? We will use this topic as a pilot on Discuss | |
| Review updated list of CC inherited Objectives/Initiatives | Team | Based on our review, we decided that CC will own or take part in driving these initiatives and Objectives Spreadsheet version: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1KZ-n6KgSLbv3a4GHN19VDuM83DfD2vSOqwFfAME4gtk/edit#gid=0 |
| Potential review/qualification of Organizations that are interested in Joining FOLIO | The FOLIO Officers (Manager/Secretary/Treasurer) are working through the MoU process and tracking mechanisms and a question has come up: If an organization expresses an interest in joining FOLIO - is there a "vetting" or approval process? Or, can any organization that wants to join (and commit resources) just join? Q - Why would we say no to any organization? Boaz - need to be sure goals and strategic interests are addressed Ian Walls - it's open source, why would there be any vetting? Harry - the project is interested in expanding both members and functionality Marko - instead of vetting why don't new members just get introduced to CC? Tom - does the process include onboarding steps? Or just signing and filing? - Right now it's just filing | |
| Updates | Team | Communications: Onboarding: .
Treasurer: No update Grants:
Events: New Member Campaign: |
| Other |
...