...
- Paul Trumble
- Virginia Martin
- Abigail Wickes
- Sara Colglazier
- Julie McNeely
- Nancy Pelis
- Martina Schildt
- Lindsey Taggart
- Dwayne Swigert
- Tracy L Patton
- Ann Crowley
- Dennis Bridges
- Heather Thoele
- Marmot Library
- Janet Ewing
- Kristen Wilson
- Owen Stephens
- Michael Arthur
- Tracy L Patton
Discussion items
Item | Who | Notes |
---|---|---|
Minute taker | ||
Announcements/Updates
|
| |
Return to Receiving discussion
| Didn't address this topic during this meeting | |
Renewal interaction
| Didn't address this topic during this meeting | |
Jiras that need SIG review See list in Jira
| UXPROD-2392 Discussion:
|
|
|
Question from Virginia Martin: For ongoing orders that you don't encumber them year to year - would that get lost? Exactly the same scenario - it's important to be able to clearly see what's encumbered vs. an invoice awaiting payment. How will we be able to report on those -
Scott Perry: |
Need to look at financial picture in the aggregate, not just fund by fund. |
Drill down when needed, but need to make sure we can see aggregate as well. Dennis: I want to see detailed information about what's happened. If we're seeing $0 for encumbered values we want to see what is awaiting payment in the transaction list. Aleph provides a transaction view. OLE provides a summation Virgina wants the option to have the encumbrance not |
released, so both need to be possible; I don't have a preference for the default. Dennis: The consensus is that the detail is important to see at the transaction level. Use case from Virginia/Sara: spending restrictions were put in place and we needed to see total amount encumbrance vs. total amount that is awaiting payment (hasn't been sent to AP yet). We need to be able to distinguish between these. There is different level of commitment between these two states and it's important for us to see both Standing orders aren't encumbered - Mt Holyoke doesn't encumber any standing orders. When they arrive we invoice them and it commits the money from the fund, but prior that there are no dollars encumbered. At Duke there are over 5000 standing orders that aren't encumbered. Chicago as well - no encumbrances for continuing orders. Dennis - we're talking about two different things:
Ann Crowley (via chat) - can we add the PO line to the transactions screen? Dennis summation: Seems like we're leaning toward the detailed approach (option |
1). In the case that we didn't have an encumbrance in the first place, we would create an awaiting payment transaction linked directly to whatever invoice resulted in that transaction. Need to make sure that we always have a link to the records that triggered the transaction to enable detailed investigation. Last question: When these commitments happen - originally the key states were Approved, Paid.
Dennis - Conclusion The feature is 2393 "Set money aside as awaiting payment for invoices" I think we should split this because we absolutely have to be able to commit the money. Worried that if this becomes bigger it won't get done in Q2. He'll simplify this original one, create a second feature that addresses adding the pending status. The enhancement of encumbrances and traceability for transactions that relate to awaiting payment would also be a separate feature. He'll post the JIRA numbers and we can rank them. |