Versions Compared

Old Version 4

changes.mady.by.user Craig McNally

Saved on

compared with

New Version 5

changes.mady.by.user Craig McNally

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Date

...

TimeItemWhoNotes
1 minScribeAll

Dennis Benndorf is next in the list, followed by Zak Burke 

5-10 min

Review outstanding action itemsAll


3 minCouncil Goals/ObjectivesAll

Follow-up from previous meetings...

Previous notes:

From Mike Gorrell:

I have created a clean copy of what the Community Council created to identify which FOLIO Goals/Objectives were under the purview of the CC. We also took a stab at what thought would be handled by PC or TC. Please feel free to give us feedback/etc. https://docs.google.com/document/d/17jVxW2XEK2bRSpXG9_FvdVtgqDfCTeKKM5h49IIhmRw/edit#heading=h.m2gdb67ibe1x. and use for your planning purposes.

Update from Tod Olson?

Can we set a deadline for having something ready for the TC to review and discuss?

3 minUpgrade/Migration Script Performance

Raman Auramau

Quick update from Raman Auramau?

Action Items with deadlines?

15-20 min

New Module Technical Evaluation

Previously: "External Code Submissions"

Craig McNally

Zak Burke 

15-20 min

Technical Decision Making Process

Jakub Skoczen

This is a carry-over from last week.

  • The tech leads group not being a decision making body
  • Whether it's realistic and/or desirable for the TC to make every technical decision
    • There was some overlap here with the external code submission topic

Additional Context: 

For Today:

  • We had homework to review Jakub Skoczen's document and provide feedback/questions/comments.
    • Does the RFC proposal meet the purpose outlined here in this document?
    • Are there other proposals for a decision making process (maybe that borrow parts of the RFC process)?
  • From last week:  "need some feedback, will come back next week"

Time permitting

TC charter review

All

...

  •  Craig McNally to create a place on the wiki where we can capture meeting rules/policies, how meetings are run, how agendas are formed, etc. - by 11/17
  •  Tod Olson , Jeremy Huff , Anton Emelianov (Deactivated) to connect on the cross-council group for defining the larger process for new module acceptance - no clear deadline defined, but effectively should happen by 11/17
  •  Jakub Skoczen and Stripes Architecture to devise a transition plan for auth token expiration, adoption of refresh tokens, etc.  - no clear deadline defined, but soon given that some of this is tentatively scheduled for Lotus
  •  Craig McNally , Zak Burke , Jakub Skoczen , Raman Auramau to discuss the formation of an executive TC group for forming meeting agendas and how it might work - no clear deadline defined
  •  Tod Olson to define a deadline for having a set of Goals/Objectives ready for the TC to review and discuss - by 11/17

...