Versions Compared

Version Old Version 8 New Version 9
Changes made by

Philip Robinson

Philip Robinson

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

TimeItemWhoNotes
1 minScribeAll

Philip Robinson is scribe, Tod Olson next

5 min

Review outstanding action itemsAll


5 minTCR Board ReviewAll

Bulk edit - Craig McNally  will ask Magda and team for a self-eval.

5 min

New Module Technical Evaluation

Previously: "External Code Submissions"

Craig McNally

Tod Olson 

Marc Johnson 

Quick update from the sub-group? 

Quick update from the cross-council group for defining the end-to-end process? 

< 5 minLTS & Versioning

Mike Gorrell 

Steffen Köhler 

Update on the formation of working group?

15-20 minCouncil Goals/ObjectivesAll

Previous notes:

To review this in the meeting next week.

5-10 minPrivacy SIG

All / Peter Murray 

The Privacy SIG has updated their charter.  Sounds like review is needed by the TC.  See Privacy SIG. Has been approved by PC 2021-12-09 Meeting notes
5-10 min

Technical Decision Making Process

Jeremy Huff 

Zak Burke 

This is a carry-over from previous weeks.

  • The tech leads group not being a decision making body
  • Whether it's realistic and/or desirable for the TC to make every technical decision
    • There was some overlap here with the external code submission topic

Additional Context: 

For Today:

Any updates on these two things from last week?

  • Jeremy Huff suggested that we form a working group to define more detail around this topic. Craig McNally  agreed that was a good idea or alternatively, we need other proposals
  • Zak Burke volunteered to identify categories of decisions the TC makes and suggest applicable processes



5-10 min

Participation and Attendance ExpectationsAll

Jeremy Huff created a page to track working groups... Should we take a look together and see if anything should be added/adjusted?

  • Is there anything else we want to do for this topic?
  • Is it enough to ask those in sub groups to add them to the page?

Action: we should discuss at next meeting about appointing sub-groups when there are not enough volunteers.

Time permitting



  • Another meeting rules thing: should we have a formal policy/discussion about attendance, discussion, and decision making when attendance is low/less than half?

Action items

  •   Bulk edit - Craig McNally  will ask Magda and team for a self-eval