Versions Compared

Old Version 3

changes.mady.by.user Charlotte Whitt

Saved on

compared with

New Version 4

changes.mady.by.user Steffen Köhler

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

TimeItemWhoNotes
1 minScribeAll

Steffen Köhler is the next in the list, followed by Chulin Meng 

5 min

Review outstanding action itemsAll

Zak Burke no progress on "identify categories of decisions the TC makes and suggest applicable processes"

3 minDec 29th MeetingAllGiven vacations/holidays, should we just cancel the meeting on Dec. 29th?
10-15 minTCR Board ReviewAll
  • 2 new Submissions
    • both incomplete, both about multiple modules (package deal), postponed yet
  • Zak Burke therefore TCRs should be split, each per module
  • Owen Stephens , Marc Johnson , VBar mention a timing issue with these process
10-15 minmod-inventory-update Evaluation Review

Mikhail Fokanov All

I hear that the evaluation is completed, to be presented by Mikhail Fokanov 

5-10 min

New Module Technical Evaluation

Previously: "External Code Submissions"

Craig McNally

Tod Olson 

Marc Johnson 

Quick update from the sub-group?

Quick update from the cross-council group for defining the end-to-end process? 

3 minCouncil Goals/ObjectivesAll

Previous notes:


20 min (Time permitting & Depending on attendance)

Technical Decision Making Process

Jakub Skoczen

This is a carry-over from last week.

  • The tech leads group not being a decision making body
  • Whether it's realistic and/or desirable for the TC to make every technical decision
    • There was some overlap here with the external code submission topic

Additional Context: 

For Today:

  • We had homework to review Jakub Skoczen's document and provide feedback/questions/comments.
    • Does the RFC proposal meet the purpose outlined here in this document?
    • Are there other proposals for a decision making process (maybe that borrow parts of the RFC process)?
  • Last time discussed:  "need some feedback, will come back next week".  Skipped last week due to low attendance.

Postponing, need more feedback on document.


Jeremy Huff  asked which decisions would be covered by this topic? Craig McNally agreed that a policy on which decisions fit into this process is an important part of this topic.


Jeremy Huff suggested that we form a working group to define more detail around this topic. Craig McNally  agreed that was a good idea or alternatively, we need other proposals


Tod Olson stated that he felt the RFC process is a good fit for our needs.


Zak Burke suggested it would be good to have a workflow for what kinds of decisions need which decision making process and guidelines for expectations around our decisions. Craig McNally agreed, and acknowledged that one of the challenges with each process is deciding on it's applicability


 Zak Burke volunteered to identify categories of decisions the TC makes and suggest applicable processes

20 min

(Time permitting and Depending on attendance)

Participation and Attendance ExpectationsAll
  • Low attendance/participation from some members is becoming concerning - it's probably worth aligning on expectations.  
  • Use of proxies?
  • How to handle low attendance
    • Cancel the meeting?
    • Still meet and make progress on things that don't require decisions to be made, e.g. review proposals and provide feedback, at least go through the usual updates
  • ...

Discussion:

  • Strong preferences for not cancelling meetings.
  • Comments in favor of leaning on proxies, but not too much.
    • Some projects (e.g. NPM) have minimal requirements for attendance, not clear we want to formalize this.
  • Need more participation outside of meeting, there is more to be done than 1 hour per week in meeting.
  • How to set expectations about participation?
    • Probably best to set vague expectations to promote useful participation.
    • Examples of participation might be useful
    • Setting metrics is probably neither practical nor has the right tone.
  • Baseline
    • Encouragement at all meetings is encouraged, and if cannot make a meeting send a proxy
    • Happy to use half-plus-one to make decisions, and lean on lazy consensus unless there is a call for a vote
    • Homework!
  • Ideas for broad expectations:

See 2021-12-01 Meeting notes for additional details.

Time permitting



  • Another meeting rules thing: should we have a formal policy/discussion about attendance, discussion, and decision making when attendance is low/less than half? 

...