Page Comparison

Dennis Benndorf is next in the list, followed by Zak Burke 

Follow-up from previous meetings...

Previous notes:

From Mike Gorrell:

I have created a clean copy of what the Community Council created to identify which FOLIO Goals/Objectives were under the purview of the CC. We also took a stab at what thought would be handled by PC or TC. Please feel free to give us feedback/etc. https://docs.google.com/document/d/17jVxW2XEK2bRSpXG9_FvdVtgqDfCTeKKM5h49IIhmRw/edit#heading=h.m2gdb67ibe1x. and use for your planning purposes.

Update from Tod Olson?

Can we set a deadline for having something ready for the TC to review and discuss?

Raman Auramau

Quick update from Raman Auramau?

Action Items with deadlines?

Craig McNally

Zak Burke 

• JIRA workflow is ready for review
• Process document has been updated and also ready for review
• Evaluation template?  Zak Burke  to provide an update.
• The applicable deadline is Dec 3.  See Lotus (R1 2022)#Timeline

Jakub Skoczen

This is a carry-over from last week.

• The tech leads group not being a decision making body
• Whether it's realistic and/or desirable for the TC to make every technical decision
  • There was some overlap here with the external code submission topic

Additional Context: 

• 2021-10-13 Meeting notes
• 2021-10-20 Meeting notes
• 2021-10-27 Meeting notes
• 2021-11-03 Meeting notes

For Today:

• We had homework to review Jakub Skoczen's document and provide feedback/questions/comments.
  • Does the RFC proposal meet the purpose outlined here in this document?
  • Are there other proposals for a decision making process (maybe that borrow parts of the RFC process)?
• From last week:  "need some feedback, will come back next week"