Versions Compared

Version Old Version 1 New Version 2
Changes made by

Julian Ladisch

Julian Ladisch

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Split check-out performance proposals

Date

...

TimeItemWhoNotes
1 minScribeAll

2 min

Review outstanding action itemsAll


Time permittingCheck-out Performance 

Marc Johnson

Julian Ladisch


Follow-up from last week... 

Proposal from Marc Johnson: https://wiki.folio.org/display/~marcjohnson/Check+Out+PerformanceProposal from Julian Ladisch: https://wiki.folio.org/display/DD/Check+Out+Performance

Marc Johnson was asked to make a proposal for checking out performance; draft document is available by the first link above. Feedback is appreciated

There's a link to PTF analysis from the first mentioned doc


Check-out Performance 

Julian Ladisch

Counter-proposal from Julian Ladisch: https://wiki.folio.org/display/DD/Check+Out+Performance

The Capacity Planning Team has determined that we should proceed with the caching approach. The feature UXPROD-3317 "Improve checkout performance by caching data" and 19 stories with priority P1 (linked from the UXPROD-3317 feature) have been created.

Time permittingCouncil Goals/ObjectivesAll

Follow-up from last week... 

Previous notes:

From Mike Gorrell:

I have created a clean copy of what the Community Council created to identify which FOLIO Goals/Objectives were under the purview of the CC. We also took a stab at what thought would be handled by PC or TC. Please feel free to give us feedback/etc. https://docs.google.com/document/d/17jVxW2XEK2bRSpXG9_FvdVtgqDfCTeKKM5h49IIhmRw/edit#heading=h.m2gdb67ibe1x. and use for your planning purposes.

The goal here is to introduce this and get eyes on it.

Time permitting

Technical Decision Making Process

All

This is a carry-over from several weeks ago.  It was a tangent of the min.io/S3 conversation that started to delve into topics of:

  • The tech leads group not being a decision making body
  • Whether it's realistic and/or desirable for the TC to make every technical decision
    • There was some overlap here with the external code submission topic

Related - in the wake of last week's slack vote:

  • Revisit voting rules... simple vs super majority, voting via slack, abstentions, quorum, etc.

NOTE: We need to frame this conversation and agree upon what we're trying to accomplish and how much time we want to dedicate to it before diving in.

Time permittingExternal Code Submissions

Ian Walls/All

  • Ongoing work on Acceptance Criteria and Processes (submission, evaluation, etc.)
    • Has the Acceptance Criteria v1.0 been published somewhere yet?  What about references/links in other places.
    • Agree on short and long term goals 
      • Define processes for submission, evaluation, review, feedback, acceptance
      • Improve the AC with more verifiable criteria, links to supporting documentation, etc.


Time permittingExtended Apps / App StoreAllThe idea of having a bare-bones/minimal platform defined, which could run on it's own and optionally augmented by installing apps has recently been come up frequently.  The notion of having a FOLIO app store has been around since the start of the project, but nothing has ever come of it.  The TC may want consider finding a champion and forming a subgroup to define a proposal for how we get there.  

Time permitting

TC charter review

All

...