Date
27-Jan-2021
...
Discussion items
Time | Item | Who | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Roadmap Taskforce | Tod | The Roadmap Task Force has been formed and wants to collect info from various groups. Tod will introduce this concept. | |
| Spring Way | TC | TC has discussed this originally on 2020-11-04 where we concluded: Outcomes: 1) We agree and accept that Spring Way is an acceptable alternative to RMB 2) Tech Council recommends that new modules use the Spring Way Framework and OpenAPI instead of RMB and RAML but we should understand that there will be gaps in our processes (documentation, CI/CD) for the first (few?) modules that head down this path and the project will have to work to close those gaps. 3) Tech Council recommends an opportunistic approach for existing modules: when work needs to be done a migration to the Spring Way will be considered. A more detailed discussion around a planned migration can be had in the future. and then again on 2021-01-13 where we got an update on what tasks would be needed to include Spring Way modules into the standard CI/CD pipeline. There were actions from that meeting. TODAY we'll discuss guidance for development teams to use Spring Way. What resources, standards, tools, etc. are they to use to adopt our recommendation (Tech Council recommends that new modules use the Spring Way Framework and OpenAPI instead of RMB and RAML)? | |
| Budget management process | TC | In a past meeting (2021-01-27) we said: We'll schedule a conversation about how to establish and manage a policy around changes that might impact our budget. Discuss: | |
| New Technology requests - evaluation criteria | TC | The TC needs to develop a set of criteria/checklist to be reviewed when new technologies are suggested/requested... so that we can make consistent and transparent decisions. Our brainstorming ideas include: |