Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Attendees (please add your name) 

ItemPresenterNotes
AnnouncementsAll
  • Supporting the Michigan State community
  • Authority upgrades challenges  (Morning Glory and Nolana)
    • Jira Legacy
      serverSystem Jira
      serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
      keyPERF-456
      '
    • Long-term solution feature (Poppy)
      Jira Legacy
      serverSystem Jira
      serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
      keyUXPROD-4082
    • Will not be an issue for Orchid 
Development updatesKhalilah
Browse by call number type requirements review ChristinePPT slide deck
Authority linking - Subjects - handling sub-division questions Khalilah 
  • Q1. Should 650s' subfield v, x, y, z be controlled? 
Original authority record questionsChristine
  1. When adding local terms to non-local authority records, which is the more common use case:
    1. Edit original non-local record and add local terms
      1. Are these records differentiated from unmodified non-local records?
    2. Copy original record, save as local record, add local terms
    3. Copy original record, save as a local record, remove existing headings and replace with local heading
  2. When a local authority record is created from existing non-local record, are the existing control number fields removed (such as the 010)?  
  3. Create upon import: Is it okay for now if new imported local authority records just have the 001 retained, as in current state? 
    1. This would mean, if we wanted to add the record to an authority file source, we'd need to add the prefix prior to import, or it would map to the "Not specified" authority file

...