...
Reviewers ensure that contributions to FOLIO Analytics abide by the repository's guidelines for contributing. Contributors will contact the review board directly when there is a submission in need of review [using a dedicated FOLIO analytics review board channel on the LDP Slack]. Reviewers will outline any necessary changes clearly and communicate them to contributors in a timely manner.
...
If you would like to serve as a member of the review board, please contact (the conveners? Nassib? both?)
Add additional info about release contents and timeline? Or just put this in training?
- Difference between bugs and enhancements (e.g., "Submissions to FOLIO Analytics could represent enhancements - changes that simply add functionality to the repository - or bugs - errors in the repository files that either prevent queries from running or produce inaccurate results. Reviewers should prioritize reviews for bugs over enhancements.")
- Release timeline (e.g., "About two weeks before the planned FOLIO release date, the FOLIO Analytics repository will freeze any new submissions and transition to testing. During the testing phase, no new enhancements will be approved for inclusion in the release, but any bugs uncovered during testing should be addressed, submitted, and approved quickly. For reviewers, this means that the two weeks before the release date are times when a quick turnaround on reviews is required.")
Training topics (training still needs to be developed/scheduled)
...