Page Comparison

The group reviewed the pages and agreed on the following:

Active Implementation Subgroup: no content, OK to delete

Face-Face Meeting notes - leave the notes from the 2019 meeting, delete the content that just repeats the regular meeting notes

FOLIO Workflow demos - add note that the current demos are from older releases. The group still feels they hold value and would like to add new ones.

Gap analysis - historical record of how we decided on features for new releases - leave as is

Working Groups - rename to Historical Implementation Plans

Meeting agenda & notes - leave as is

On-boarding steps - outdated and repeats information from the main FOLIO wiki pages - Delete

Related Documents: Has one subpage, Information and User Guides, which is current and useful.  Move those pages up to replace Related Documents.

Slack Channels for Moving to FOLIO from vended systems - leave for now

Need new demos, they are helpful

Tod: should we coordinate with the Support SIG or documentation group?

Bob: Does the official documentation include videos or demos?  They are useful

Patti: could the demos be farmed out to the SIGs

Tod: seeing others' workarounds in the demos is also useful

Patti: some of the vended libraries are active in the SIGs, others are a little more shy.  Should we bring them here for introductions?  CalTech is going live now, for instance, and nobody seems to know that.

The group liked this idea and asked the vendors to invite new implementers to future meetings?

Hosting/migration service providers - lessons learned, not sales pitch

Print Serials management - maybe a conversation with the PO (Dennis Bridges) and maybe AMB

Communication with university community

SysOps will want to ask about integrations with external systems, how are they going for implemented libraries?  How do you get your vouchers to university payment office? IS NCIP working?