Versions Compared

Old Version 9

changes.mady.by.user Charlotte Whitt

Saved on

compared with

New Version 10

changes.mady.by.user zeno.tajoli

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Background Information

Panel
titleWhat is the current ILS at your institution?

Homemade ILS


Panel
titleWhat is the date of your fiscal year end? Please do not include a range of your fiscal year.



Panel
titleHow is your implementation team organized?

Atcult , with the support of Ebsco+ inhouse technical team


Panel
titleHas your institution hired additional staff? How were they funded?



Panel
titleIs your institution planning to be hosted? Self-hosting? Still considering both options? Please explain.

Self-hosting


Panel
titleIs your institution considering a partial implementation, such as the ERM first? Please explain.

 The institution is considering a partial implementation. They want to use the Resource Access app to manage the essential circulation functions. For this reason they need to have also the Inventory app, in order to interact with the holdings and items (see and  check their availability and status).  They need to set also the different user authorizations and access. 


Panel
titleDoes your institution plan to run FOLIO in parallel with your current ILS? How long? Please explain.

No.


Panel
titleHow sure are you of the plans described above? Why or why not?

The plans are with strict deadlines and penalties.


Panel
titleWhat concerns do you have? What do you hope to get out of participating in this group?

We need to plan a joint prioritisation of outstanding tasks for BNCF. There are a lot of BNCF requirements that are mandatory for BNCF.

We need also to be able to reproduce in FOLIO the BNCF circulation workflow. BNCF is a National Library, so it is obliged to respect some conditions and government rules.


Panel
titleProject Management Tools Used








Institution Documentation

Links

.Attachments

Attachments