Versions Compared

Old Version 4

changes.mady.by.user Holly Mistlebauer

Saved on

compared with

New Version 5

changes.mady.by.user Lendvay Miklós

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Background Information

Panel
titleWhat is the current ILS at your institution?

AMICUS 


Panel
titleHow is your implementation team organized?

External company HerMészSoft (winner of the tender), involving others (EBSCO, Index Data, Atcult etc) + inhouse technical team + hosted infrastructure


Panel
titleHas your institution hired additional staff? How were they funded?

Tender selection; funded by the Hungarian Government


Panel
titleIs your institution planning to be hosted? Self-hosting? Still considering both options? Please explain.

Hosted by a government institution KIFÜ


Panel
titleIs your institution considering a partial implementation, such as the ERM first? Please explain.

Implementation with all the modules


Panel
titleDoes your institution plan to run FOLIO in parallel with your current ILS? How long? Please explain.

No parallel run; modules will be introduced step by step


Panel
titleHow sure are you of the plans described above? Why or why not?

The plans are with strict deadlines and penalties.


Panel
titleWhat concerns do you have? What do you hope to get out of participating in this group?

We do not want to have a Hungarian version, but we would like to contribute to and benefit from the core version of FOLIO. The management of the enrichment, gap analysis and coordination of the tasks - development, test - is a real challenge. 

We wish to work together very closely in the group with other institutions / developers to achieve our goal.







Institution Documentation

Info

Please share your implementation documentation here by either linking to it from within this section or by attaching it to this page.

Links

  •  
  •  
  •  

.Attachments

Attachments