Table of Contents outline true
Overview
- This document contains the results of testing Data Export (MARC BIB) on the Quesnelia [ECS] release on qcon environment.
| Jira Legacy | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Summary
- Data import tests finished successfully, only Test №5 had one failed record for Tenant 2(qcp1-01) when processed 50k files. Duration of DI grew in correspondence with the number of records in files.
- Check-in and Check-out with 5 virtual users was performed during DI Create new MARC authority records jobs for non-matches No issues.
- Data Import in Quesnelia without CICO perform faster than with it.
- Comparing Poppy and Quesnelia releases
- Check-in / Check-out perform better in Quesnelia. Response time improved during Create jobs for long period of work time on 15% in Average.
- DI durations improved - 11%-14% in Average.
- During testing, we noticed spikes in the mod permissions module. To mitigate this issue and prevent system slowdowns, we adjusted the order of loading files, starting with Tenant 3 (qcp1-02), followed by Tenant 2 (qcp1-01), and finally Tenant 1 (qcp1-00).
Test Results
This table contains durations for jobs with 2 job profiles.
...
Profile
...
Comparison
Test №1
Test with 1k, 10k, 25k and 50k records files DI started on one tenant only(qcp1-00), and comparative results between Poppy and Quesnelia.
...
% creates
...
File
...
DI duration
Morning Glory
...
DI duration
Nolana
...
DI duration
Orchid
...
DI duration
Poppy
...
Test №2
Test with CICO 5 concurrent users and DI 1K, 5K, 10K, 25K and 50K started on one tenant only.
- Сomparative Baseline Check-In\Check-Out results without Data Import between Poppy and Quesnelia.
...
CICO, Median time without
DI
(Poppy)
...
593 ms
+4.5%
...
- Сomparative Check-In\Check-Out results between Baseline (Quesnelia) and Check-In\Check-Out plus Data Import (Quesnelia.)
...
DI Duration with CICO
(Quesnelia)
...
20 sec
...
12 min 16 sec
...
1.265
...
- Сomparative Data Import and Check-In\Check-Out results between Poppy and Quesnelia.
...
# of records
(Poppy)
...
DI Duration with CICO
(Poppy)
...
CI time 95th pct
(Poppy)
...
CO time Avg
(Poppy)
...
CO time 95th pct
(Poppy)
...
DI Duration with CICO
(Quesnelia)
...
20 sec
-42.8%
...
12 min 16 sec
-11%
...
1.265
-16%
...
Table of Contents outline true
Overview
- This document contains the results of testing Data Export (MARC BIB) on the Quesnelia [ECS] release on qcon environment.
| Jira Legacy | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Summary
- Data import tests finished successfully, only Test №5 had one failed record for Tenant 2(qcp1-01) when processed 50k files. Duration of DI grew in correspondence with the number of records in files.
- Check-in and Check-out with 5 virtual users was performed during DI Create new MARC authority records jobs for non-matches No issues.
- Data Import in Quesnelia without CICO perform faster than with it.
- Comparing Poppy and Quesnelia releases
- Check-in / Check-out perform better in Quesnelia. Response time improved during Create jobs for long period of work time on 15% in Average.
- DI durations improved - 11%-14% in Average.
- During testing, we noticed spikes in the mod permissions module. To mitigate this issue and prevent system slowdowns, we adjusted the order of loading files, starting with Tenant 3 (qcp1-02), followed by Tenant 2 (qcp1-01), and finally Tenant 1 (qcp1-00).
Test Results
This table contains durations for jobs with 2 job profiles.
Profile | CSV File | Tenant College (cs00000int_0001) | Central Tenant (cs00000int) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Result | Status | Result | Status | ||
| DE MARC Bib (Default instances export job profile) | 1k.csv | 0:00:02 | COMPLETED | 0:00:05 | COMPLETED |
| 100k.csv | 0:02:39 | COMPLETED | 0:04:24 | COMPLETED | |
| 500k.csv | 0:05:21 | COMPLETED | 0:06:17 | COMPLETED | |
| DE MARC Bib (srs - holdings and items) | 1k.csv | 0:00:05 | COMPLETED | 0:00:05 | COMPLETED |
| 100k.csv | 0:08:15 | COMPLETED | 0:05:58 | COMPLETED | |
| 500k.csv | 0:09:22 | COMPLETED | 0:08:28 | COMPLETED | |
Comparison
This table contains durations comparison between Poppy and Quesnelia releases.
Resource utilization for Test #1 and Test #2
...