Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Date

...

Functional Area

Product Owner

Planned Release (if known)

Decision Reached

Reasoning

Link to Supporting Materials

Comments

e.g. loans, fees/finesNamee.g. Q4 2018, Q1 2019Clearly stated decision
  • Because...
  • Because...
e.g. mock-up, JIRA issue
Item statesEmma Boettcher

Recommendation: separate mechanism for ending a process from Check In

Associate the end of a process with a service point

  • Disinclined to "touch items twice", but seems preferable over the following:

    • Circ staff are responsible for ending processes through Check In; since checking items in can also trigger processes, this would make it unclear whether an item is supposed to be in a process or not
    • The system considers items to be shelved or awaiting pickup once the process ends
  • Need to know where items are coming from if they are stuck in transit
State transitions









Notes