Page Comparison

• Introductions
• Note Taker

This SIG's questions about columns F and G of the MVP Responses to Review   . Also, questions about "Additional Changes to MVP" spreadsheet tab in the same spreadsheet.

• Today is deadline for comments on the non-MVP features
• Final version will be released Sept 25
• Institutions will make their go/ no go decisions October 2

MVP = Market viable product

Background information: Institutions were asked to produce MVP worksheet (based on their rankings). Capacity Planning Team responed with comments. And now, SIG's are asked to review/respond to Capacity Planning Team response.

Very likely, SysOps related items concerning hosting have been taken care of and have not been dropped in the MVP. But let's be sure and double-check that.

Notes:

SysOps related issues have been taken out of institutions prioritization. They have to be done. The developers have alreday solved some of these things. The items don't appear in the Capacity Planning Spreadsheet anymore. Q: Should we be prioritzing ?

Jason: Database schema upgrades is the most important thing.

Harry: Let's invite Jakub for an update on database schemas upgrade .

There is a group in Brazil. Migration of bibliographic and item data from ALEPH. There is a subgroup Voyager to FOLIO. They would make those tools available to the project. The migration tools have been excluded from the Capacity Plan.

We all need some Batch Loading APIs, and we can't do that. The FOLIO project has to do this.

Jakub is coming to the Data Migration Subgroup meeting on Monday.

The most well definded items might be pulled into Q4, if resources are available.