Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • For 1 concurrent job, 100 records can be edited in 1 min 9 s which is 19 s slower compared to Nolana (50 s), and 1000 records editing could be performed in 2 min 54 s  which is 40 s slower compared to Nolana(2 min 10 s), and 10k records bulk editing is about 36% slower.
  • 10k records per user, 5 users simultaneously (50k records total) can be uploaded and edited in about 22 minutes which is about 9 min 30 s slower compared to Nolana (about 12 min 25 s).
  • The memory utilization of mod-bulk operation increases from 20% to 23% (The service was updated before the test, probably it is reaching a steady state- the memory trend will be investigated in further testing). For all other modules, no memory leaks are suspected.
  • CPU for all modules did not exceed 42% 56% for all of the tests.
  • For all records number (100, 1k,10k), and 5 concurrent jobs - RDS CPU utilization did not exceed 41%.

...

Did not exceed 17%.


Service CPU utilization

CPU for all modules did not exceed 56% for all of the tests.

Image Added


Image Added

Image Added

RDS CPU utilization

Maximum RDS CPU utilization is 41% for 5 concurrent jobs with 10k holdings records.

...