Tenant Addresses does not enforce unique naming

Description

Overview:

Tenant addresses can have the same name. Given that this value is used in drop-down menus in orders, uniqueness should be enforced. At a minimum it may look like error behavior if uniqueness is not enforced.

Scenarios

  1. Scenario

    • Given user is creating addresses in tenant settings

    • When user adds a name that is identical to an existing address name

    • Then system displays a validation error

    • Error message: "This address name is already in use."

Adapted from the reported bug below:

Environment: folio-snapshot
Login: diku_admin/admin

1. Go to Settings --> Tenant.
2. Open Addresses.
3. Add and save an address with the name "Test Library".
4. Click New.
5. Add and save a second address with the name "Test Library."

Expected behavior: FOLIO tells me the address name must be unique.
Actual behavior: The address saves with the duplicate name.

Environment

None

Potential Workaround

None

Checklist

hide

TestRail: Results

Activity

Show:

Dennis Bridges October 7, 2020 at 6:17 PM

I have update this issue type to story as we did not have a requirement to unique the address names. I can imagine it would be useful to implement but will require upgrade consideration and as such should be treated as additional functionality rather than a bug.

Ann-Marie Breaux May 15, 2020 at 11:23 PM

Looks like this one belongs to Acq, so I assigned to Tjet dev team

Details

Assignee

Reporter

Tester Assignee

Priority

Development Team

Thunderjet

TestRail: Cases

Open TestRail: Cases

TestRail: Runs

Open TestRail: Runs

Created October 31, 2019 at 7:14 PM
Updated June 13, 2023 at 5:05 PM
TestRail: Cases
TestRail: Runs