Skip to:

  1. Skip to Jira Navigation
  2. Skip to Side Navigation
  3. Skip to Main Content

Update POL Cost detail accordion

Description

Purpose: Improve the usability of the fields in the cost details accordion on the Purchase order line.

User story statement(s):

As an ordering librarian
I want to see cost details with price and quantity next to each other and with consistent labeling
so that it is easy for me to understand what fields I need to populate in order to represent the cost of what I am ordering.

Scenarios:

  1. Scenario: :check_mark:

    • Given User is creating/editing a POL

    • When when inputing cost details

    • Then the order of fields is as follows: (See screenshot)

      • Physical unit price

      • Quantity physical

      • Currency

      • Additional cost

      • Electronic unit price (Current label "Unit price of electronic" must change)

      • Quantity electronic

      • Discount

      • Type

      • Estimated price

  2. Scenario: :check_mark:

    • Given the user has created a POL with cost details

    • When the user is viewing the cost details accordion in the view pane

    • Then the fields appear the same order described above (See screenshot 2)

  3. Scenario: :check_mark:

    • Given User is creating/editing a PO template

    • When when inputing cost details at POL

    • Then the order of fields is as follows: (See screenshot 3)

      • Physical unit price

      • Quantity physical

      • Currency

      • Additional cost

      • Electronic unit price (Current label "Unit price of electronic" must change)

      • Quantity electronic

      • Discount

      • Type

      • Estimated price

  4. Scenario: :check_mark:

    • Given the user has created a PO template with cost details

    • When the user is viewing the cost details accordion in the template view screen

    • Then the fields appear the same order described above (See screenshot 4)

Environment

None

Potential Workaround

None

Attachments

9
  • 08 Apr 2021, 01:08 PM
  • 01 Oct 2020, 08:12 AM
  • 29 Sep 2020, 07:39 PM
  • 29 Sep 2020, 07:39 PM
  • 29 Sep 2020, 05:13 PM
  • 14 Sep 2020, 04:48 PM
  • 14 Sep 2020, 04:47 PM
  • 14 Sep 2020, 04:45 PM
  • 14 Sep 2020, 04:42 PM

Checklist

hide

TestRail: Results

Activity

Show:

Aliaksei Chumakou April 12, 2021 at 3:47 PM

I see your point, thanks. However, it's not related to that particular ticket or changes related to it. What do you think if it's a good idea to create a separate bug-ticket to fix the label?

Alexander Soto April 12, 2021 at 2:48 PM

Hi .  I think that the label displayed is wrong because this order is not either "Print/Electronic Mix" or "physical" is an electronic resource package then why showed up the "physical unit price" label instead of the "electronic unit price"? I understood that it appearing because of the ispackage=true field but although it is a package, it is not a physical resource but an electronic one.   I think to solve this issue is only to delete the first part of the label where appears "physical" and to leave "unit price" only. In that way, you could leave on this field both information of price for physical and electronic and is not confusing for the end-user

Aliaksei Chumakou April 8, 2021 at 3:38 PM
Edited

 it looks like expected behavior. Your line has isPackage=true and orderFormat isn't 'P/E Mix'. The label is displayed basing on these fields values. Do you think it's wrong? 

BTW, I don't think it's connected to this ticket, because it was done a year ago in scope of https://folio-org.atlassian.net/browse/UIOR-503#icft=UIOR-503

Alexander Soto April 8, 2021 at 1:09 PM
Edited

I saw that this case closed; however, I have seen the following display issue: 

I have an electronic poLines with the following information: { "id": "ac28ba72-f01c-4ab6-b10c-a4bed11eeba3","checkinItems": false, "acquisitionMethod": "Purchase At Vendor System","alerts": [], "claims": [],    "collection": false,   "contributors": [],  "cost": {      "listUnitPriceElectronic": 24731.27,     "currency": "GBP",        "discountType": "percentage",        "quantityElectronic": 1,        "poLineEstimatedPrice": 24731.27  },

note that in the listUnitpriceElectronic field a price has been included, but in the poLines the information is displaying on "physical unit price" 

 

please check on Iris: https://bugfest-iris.folio.ebsco.com/orders/view/1bc97897-3c38-4a04-ae9d-d9913f76ec4c/po-line/edit/ac28ba72-f01c-4ab6-b10c-a4bed11eeba3?query=1006154232021 

Dennis Bridges October 5, 2020 at 2:49 PM

testing successful in FOLIO-testing

Done

Details

Assignee

Reporter

Tester Assignee

Labels

Priority

Story Points

Sprint

Development Team

Thunderjet

Parent

Fix versions

TestRail: Cases

Open TestRail: Cases

TestRail: Runs

Open TestRail: Runs
Created September 14, 2020 at 4:49 PM
Updated April 12, 2021 at 3:47 PM
Resolved October 5, 2020 at 2:49 PM
TestRail: Cases
TestRail: Runs

Flag notifications