Details
Assignee
UnassignedUnassignedReporter
Aaron NeslinAaron NeslinTester Assignee
Dennis BridgesDennis BridgesLabels
Priority
TBDDevelopment Team
ThunderjetTestRail: Cases
Open TestRail: CasesTestRail: Runs
Open TestRail: Runs
Details
Details
Assignee
Unassigned
UnassignedReporter
Aaron Neslin
Aaron NeslinTester Assignee
Dennis Bridges
Dennis BridgesLabels
Priority
Development Team
Thunderjet
TestRail: Cases
Open TestRail: Cases
TestRail: Runs
Open TestRail: Runs
Created November 8, 2023 at 5:16 PM
Updated July 11, 2024 at 6:19 PM
Purpose:
In the Holdings record, the format can be set. It can be electronic or physical. In the Order line, the Order Format can be set. Can this value be transferred to the Holdings record format (if one is creating a Holdings Record in Inventory using the Create Inventory Function? That way:
Note: Currently the holdings type field IS NOT populated with a value when the holding is created by the holdings app. This is problematic because it is difficult to identify these holdings and clean the up
Electronic Resource Order Format = Electronic Holdings Type
Physical Resource Order Format = Physical Holdings Type
What to do if the order format is mixed (P/E Mix) = Physical Holdings Type (User would need to manually adjust holdings as desired as they currently do)
What to do if the order format is other (Other) = Physical Holdings Type (These might be an edge case as generally format other is used with a create inventory setting that does not include holding or item.)
Note: Holdings type is a configurable field so in order for the application to set this field we likely need specific mappings
Allowing an area in settings where users could select a corresponding Holdings type for each available order format would provide the necessary flexibility for libraries that want to use this functionality in a particular way.
Being able to map a default value could be a short term win to allow these holdings to be identified post order more easily and corrected.
Otherwise just allowing user to specify the holdings type per order line would account for more of the possible complexity.
93
User story statement(s):
As an acquisitions librarians
I want the holdings type to be sent to the holdings record
so that I can save time creating holdings records
Scenarios:
Scenario: Add Holdings type to physical/e-resource details
Given an order has been created
and a PO line has been added
and "Create Inventory" includes holdings
When a user Sets Order format
Then "Holdings Type" drop down will display
Scenario: Propagate Holdings type in POL to Inventory
Given a PO line has been created
and the PO line includes "Create Holdings"
and a "Holdings Type" has been selected
When a user opens the Purchase order
Then the Holdings type in the POL will populate the Holdings Type in the Inventory Holdings Record
Scenario: Add Holdings type to Order Template
Given there is an order template
and and the order template includes "Create Holding"
and a "Holdings Type" has been selected
When a user sets order format in the template
Then Holdings Type" drop down will display
and a PO/POL created from the template will include the Holding Type