There should not be separate "bin" and "scripts" directories
Description
CSP Request Details
None
CSP Rejection Details
None
Potential Workaround
None
relates to
Checklist
hideTestRail: Results
Activity
Show:
Charlotte Whitt November 7, 2023 at 7:49 AM
Okay. I'll close the ticket as done. Np.
Mike Taylor November 6, 2023 at 7:29 PM
Trying to verify this seems nonsensical to me. It's a change that means nothing to anyone but the developer.
Charlotte Whitt November 6, 2023 at 6:09 PM
So - normally all UI tickets needs to be verified, manual tested in FOLIO Snapshot. Sometimes you need to verify the change by looking in the developer tool. Does that make sense?
How exactly to verify I have not looked in to (yet) - but can do that, if I'm to pick up this test.
Mike Taylor November 6, 2023 at 5:09 PM
I don't understand what wants to do by way of manual testing. Look at https://github.com/folio-org/ui-ldp and note that there is no longer a scripts directory at the top level?
Charlotte Whitt November 2, 2023 at 1:19 PM
Hi - please do the manual testing of this ticket, and then we can close it.
Done
Created October 31, 2023 at 12:45 PM
Updated November 7, 2023 at 7:49 AM
Resolved November 7, 2023 at 7:49 AM
TestRail: Cases
TestRail: Runs
I created
binto hold thefolio-port-ldp-queries.mjsscript (see ). Then, forgetting that I already had this, I createdscriptsto holdadd-tq-repo.js. Having both of these areas is confusing — made worse by the fact that one of them has its ownpackage.jsonfor its@indexdata/foliojsdependency but the other does not.The
bindirectory is externally known — mentioned in the change-log, in a Jira issue and in release notes — so it should persist, andscriptsshould merged into it.