Sounds good, thanks! Shame we have no machine-readable way of documenting the CQL support, but I guess that is a luxury we can easily enough live without.
Sorting on material-type looks good. I'll close the issue as done.
Marc Johnson August 1, 2017 at 1:12 PM
Following the conversation about interface versions, I bumped item-storage to version 3.1 and inventory to version 2.1 to reflect that the CQL indexes have expanded (this is only a comment in the interface description, as I don't really know another way of describing it).
At present, it's only possible to sort by material-type ID, as discussed in UIT-28.