Done
Details
Details
Assignee
Dmytro Melnyshyn
Dmytro MelnyshynReporter
Valery_Pilko
Valery_PilkoPriority
Story Points
1
Sprint
None
Development Team
Spitfire
Fix versions
Release
Sunflower (R1 2025)
RCA Group
Data related (ex. Can be detected with large dataset only)
TestRail: Cases
Open TestRail: Cases
TestRail: Runs
Open TestRail: Runs
Created February 13, 2025 at 4:27 PM
Updated March 14, 2025 at 3:02 PM
Resolved February 19, 2025 at 8:48 PM
Overview:
During testing of Call number browse refactor on https://folio-etesting-sprint-fs09000000.ci.folio.org/ we found that using “itemNormalizedCallNumbers” as search field return more Instances (Titles) than expected to the search result list during switching from call number browse to search.
Steps to reproduce
Authorize as admin on https://folio-etesting-sprint-fs09000000.ci.folio.org/
Go to “Inventory” >> “Browse”
Select “
Call numbers (all)
" browse optionBrowse for “TF1 1” call number
Click on the exact match result which has “1” in “Number of titles” column
Expected result: Same number of Instances as specified in “Number of titles” column are found.
Actual result: More Instances are found than specified in “Number of titles” column.
Instances with following call numbers are found:
- TF113.A3W38 2002
- TF1 195
- TF1 122
Another example: QR1.C66
Additional information:
When I’ve used "itemFullCallNumbers" instead of “itemNormalizedCallNumbers” this issues is not reproduced. So, I suggest use it.