Additional values needed for Electronic Access fields or 856 subfields
CSP Request Details
None
CSP Rejection Details
None
CSP Approved
None
Description
Environment
None
Potential Workaround
None
Checklist
hideTestRail: Results
Activity
Show:
Jennifer Eustis April 22, 2024 at 3:46 PM
I believe this was discussed at the last WolfCon. We use these fields but there is no way to map them currently in the electronic access field. Would it be possible to provide a review and some sort of timeline when this can be worked on? Thanks
Details
Details
Assignee
Unassigned
UnassignedReporter
Jennifer EustisPriority
TBDDevelopment Team
Folijet
Parent
Release
Not Scheduled
TestRail: Cases
Open TestRail: Cases
TestRail: Runs
Open TestRail: Runs
Created September 14, 2023 at 3:22 PM
Updated February 14, 2025 at 4:54 PM
TestRail: Cases
TestRail: Runs
Current situation: The number of subfields from the 856 now available in the Electronic fields in the instance, holdings, and item is limited. We would like to expand that to accommodate the detail that we need to create and manage.
In scope Add:
non public note (856$x)
access status (856$7)
terms governing access (856$n)
persistent URI (856$g)
MARC mapping needs to be updated as well
Not in scope: 857