Bugfest. Item with item status Lost and paid, have Action Mark as missing associated
Description
CSP Request Details
CSP Rejection Details
Potential Workaround
Attachments
- 07 Apr 2022, 04:37 PM
- 07 Apr 2022, 04:36 PM
- 07 Apr 2022, 04:35 PM
Checklist
hideTestRail: Results
Activity
Charlotte Whitt June 9, 2022 at 4:44 PM
@(OLD ACCOUNT) Erin Nettifee and @Holly Mistlebauer - then I'll close this ticket as Won't do.
(OLD ACCOUNT) Erin Nettifee April 11, 2022 at 3:54 PM
Charlotte, the RA SIG does have a use case for this - infrequent but can happen - a library moves a fine to lost and paid, and then the patron comes back and re-disputes the charge. Libraries want to have the flexibility to move the item out of the lost and paid status to missing in those scenarios (some libraries aren't using long missing.)
@Holly Mistlebauer just an FYI
Charlotte Whitt April 7, 2022 at 4:51 PM
Note to self:
@(OLD ACCOUNT) Erin Nettifee will bring it up with the RA SIG next week, to get their say
Charlotte Whitt April 7, 2022 at 4:41 PM
Hi @(OLD ACCOUNT) Erin Nettifee this came up when the tester tried to write a script for a very old Test Rail case written back in 2019.
Is there a usecase where we would want to mark an item
Lost and paid, and then later mark as:
Missing
If that is a real life scenario then that's all fine, but if not then this is a bug. Will you double check for me, the wanted behavior?
Details
Details
Assignee
Reporter
Tester Assignee
Labels
Priority
P3
@Charlotte Whitt added note from Refinement discussions:
@(OLD ACCOUNT) Erin Nettifee - 11/Apr/22 3:54 PM
Charlotte, the RA SIG does have a use case for this - infrequent but can happen - a library moves a fine to lost and paid, and then the patron comes back and re-disputes the charge. Libraries want to have the flexibility to move the item out of the lost and paid status to missing in those scenarios (some libraries aren't using long missing.)
Based on the input from the RA-SIG, this ticket is closed as Won't do.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Overview: FAT script tester has found that an item with item status Lost and paid, have the Actions Mark as missing associated - but click throws an error message.
The logic for items with item status Lost and paid, should not be marked as missing.
Steps to Reproduce:
Log into FOLIO Snapshot as user diku_admin
Any item with item status Lost and paid (and if no item, then this needs to be created first)
Select the Actions menu
Expected Results:
There should not be an action item labeled Mark as missing
Actual Results:
There is an action item labeled Mark as missing.
When clicking the action item, then following confirmation modal is displayed: "Title" (material type) (Barcode: xxx)'s item status will be marked as Missing.
Additional Information:
Documentation of implemented item statuses:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1el9_XTlpZKNzYqWSoN_XcCQxdgZDxwB_blbSWrcsAL8/edit#gid=670413620
Spread sheet (by Tod Olsson): https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1vauwFufDLFBtzQ3TE0QZG6wblAeEaM9-fhrTSEHsqM8/edit#gid=0
URL:
Interested parties: @(OLD ACCOUNT) Erin Nettifee