Allow for mapping the POL's expense class based on expense class CODE in MARC record
Description
CSP Request Details
None
CSP Rejection Details
None
Potential Workaround
None
defines
relates to
Checklist
hideTestRail: Results
Activity
Show:

Kateryna Senchenko February 17, 2023 at 8:52 AM
The issue was fixed from UI side

Ann-Marie Breaux February 13, 2023 at 8:19 AM
Hi Tested on Snapshot, and all looks good - thank you!
I created test https://foliotest.testrail.io/index.php?/cases/view/376975 that tests 4 versions of fund and expense class mappings. Once you review it, please set it to Critical path, and then this Jira can be closed. Thank you!

Ann-Marie Breaux February 9, 2023 at 7:45 AMEdited
Hi I'll create the TestRail for this Jira, combined with . Thank you!

Ann-Marie Breaux February 7, 2023 at 8:05 AM
Hi Yes, but I'll want to add a couple TestRails for this Jira and , once it's ready

Kateryna Senchenko February 6, 2023 at 2:47 PM
Hi , this case should be resolved in scope of . Can we close this issue as a duplicate after verifying?
Duplicate
Details
Details
Assignee

Reporter

Priority
Story Points
0.5
Sprint
None
Development Team
Folijet
Release
Orchid (R1 2023)
RCA Group
Lack of testing
TestRail: Cases
Open TestRail: Cases
TestRail: Runs
Open TestRail: Runs
Created February 2, 2023 at 7:06 AM
Updated March 2, 2023 at 12:45 PM
Resolved February 17, 2023 at 8:52 AM
TestRail: Cases
TestRail: Runs
Purpose: To confirm ability to map an incoming expense class code from the MARC Bib into the expense class field of the POL
As a staff person working with MARC Bib order data
I want FOLIO to be able to interpret the expense class CODE data properly
So that I can use it to populate the expense class field of the POL
Scenarios
Scenario 1
Given the Data Import field mapping profile
When a user specifies a MARC field and subfield for the POL expense class
Then use that data to find the appropriate FOLIO expense class to assign in the POL's expense class field
NOTES:
The incoming MARC expense class code should be an exact match to the FOLIO expense class code, except the match should ignore case (e.g. hist and Hist and HIST are the same fund code, but are not the same fund code as history and History and HISTORY)
Per the SMEs, MARC mapping is not required for the expense class name or the expense class name (expense class code), but only for the expense class code
BE: test after is done, not additional BE effort is required