Details
Details
Assignee
Kurt Nordstrom
Kurt NordstromReporter
Kevin Day
Kevin DayPriority
Development Team
None
TestRail: Cases
Open TestRail: Cases
TestRail: Runs
Open TestRail: Runs
Created December 17, 2024 at 4:09 PM
Updated December 17, 2024 at 4:09 PM
I’m not sure what project is the best to report this in, so I went with mod-ldp.
Please direct me to the correct place if this is incorrect.
The
items_holdings_instances
derived table has removedholdings_record_id
in favor ofholdings_id
as per:https://github.com/folio-org/folio-analytics/issues/693
https://github.com/folio-org/folio-analytics/pull/700
I refactored some LDP related SQL scripts that I use where I used
holdings_record_id
to now instead beholdings_id
and discovered thatfolio_reporting.item_ext
still usesholdings_record_id
rather thanholdings_id
.see: https://github.com/folio-org/folio-analytics/blob/main/reports/item_ext.sql
This makes working with LDP / Folio Analytics a bit more confusing and error prone.
It would be really great if some future version would make the references to the holdings record id / holdings id consistent across the board.