Controlled subfields of Second repeatable and linked field could be overwritten by "Data import" update.
Description
CSP Request Details
CSP Rejection Details
Potential Workaround
Attachments
blocks
defines
is required by
relates to
requires
Checklist
hideTestRail: Results
Activity
Khalilah Gambrell April 28, 2023 at 12:16 PM
Hey - I will create the issue but I probably won't get to it for a week or so.
Yauhen Viazau April 28, 2023 at 8:28 AMEdited
Hi , could you please create a story for Issue #2 mentioned above? We have a TC that is failing due to this. Alternatively, should me or Valery create a bug for this issue?
Valery_Pilko April 21, 2023 at 2:48 PM
So, after discussion, we've agreed that:
found Issue №1 - (When updating $0 in several fields, only the first one is unlinked, and all updated) - will be fixed in scope of MODSOURMAN-974
found Issue №2 - (When two repeatable fields linked to the same record, and one of them has $0 updated, it is added as a new linked field with updated data (original field remains the same) - will create a different story/feature to address this.
I'm moving this issue in PO review.
Valery_Pilko April 21, 2023 at 9:09 AM
Hey
looks like you were right about the scenario:
When we have 3 repeatable fields linked to different "MARC authority" records
AND When update $0 in each.
AND If in this case, delete all subfields $9 from updated fields
Then all fields will be unlinked and updated properly.
See attached screencast:
Does that mean that the issue №2 mentioned by will be fixed after some of the following stories?
Yauhen Viazau April 20, 2023 at 9:06 AM
Tested on Snapshot-1 - issues found
Issues:
When two repeatable fields linked to the same record, and one of them has $0 updated, it is added as a new linked field with updated data (original field remains the same)
When updating $0 in several fields, only the first one is unlinked, and all updated
See screencasts for issues:
Adding/updating controllable, non-controllable subfields in one linked or unlinked field works as expected.
Adding/updating $9 and $0 in one field also works as expected.
No issues when deleting a field.
See screencasts with working functionality:
- please review
Details
Assignee
Viacheslav KolesnykViacheslav KolesnykReporter
Valery_PilkoValery_PilkoPriority
P2Story Points
3Sprint
NoneDevelopment Team
SpitfireFix versions
Release
Poppy (R2 2023)RCA Group
Missing integration/unit testAffected releases
Orchid (R1 2023)TestRail: Cases
Open TestRail: CasesTestRail: Runs
Open TestRail: Runs
Details
Details
Assignee
Viacheslav KolesnykReporter
Valery_PilkoPriority
P2
Overview: Controlled subfields of Second repeatable (with same indicators as first repeatable field) and linked field could be overwritten by "Data import" update.
Controlled subfields that could be overwritten:
letter subfields (according to mapping rules of linked field)
$0
$9
Steps to Reproduce:
Preconditions:
Repeatable (not first) field which has same indicators must be linked, for example:
The "700" MARC field with "$a" value "Lee, Stan," of imported "Instance" record ("
") must be linked to the "100" field of imported "MARC Authority" record ("
")
Log into Orchid FOLIO environment as User with following permissions:
Inventory: All permissions
MARC Authority: View MARC authority record
quickMARC: View, edit MARC bibliographic record
Data import: Can upload files, import, and view logs
UI: Data export module is enabled
Go to "Inventory" app and find the record from precondition (search query ex.: "Black Panther")
Export record from precondition by clicking on checkbox next to it (in the result list) >> Click "Actions" >> "Export instances (MARC)"
Go to "Data export" and download the exported record.
Open downloaded record via "MarcEdit".
Edit controlled subfield of linked field (ex.:
1 case - edit "$a" only
2 case - edit "$0" only
3 case - edit "$9" only
Edit any not controlled subfield if linked field (ex: "$e" subfield)
Save the record and upload it via "Data import" using "Update MARC bibliographic record" profile (need to create it with match by "999 ff $s")
Once import is complete, open updated "MARC bibliographic record" in "Inventory" and check for updates.
Expected Results:
in 1 case: Link remains. Only not controlled subfield was updated.
in 2 case: Link deleted. Not controlled subfield was updated
in 3 case: Link remains. Only not controlled subfield was updated.
Actual Results:
In cases 1-3: Link remains, and all updates made by user are saved (controlled subfields were updated: $a, $0 or $9)
On screenshot is shown case 1 and 2:
Additional Information: see attached screencast
Interested parties: